Department of Renewable Resources, 442 Earth Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
Tree Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;37(12):1597-1610. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx089.
Chemical induction can drive tree susceptibility to and host range expansions of attacking insects and fungi. Recently, mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins; MPB) has expanded its host range from its historic host lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Douglas ex Loudon) to jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb) in western Canada. Beetle success in jack pine forests likely depends upon the suitability of tree chemistry to MPB and its symbiotic phytopathogenic fungi. In particular, how rapid induced defenses of jack pine affect MPB colonization and the beetle's symbionts is unknown. In the field, we characterized and compared differences in rapid induced phloem monoterpenes between lodgepole and jack pines in response to various densities of Grosmannia clavigera (Robinson-Jeffery and Davidson)-a MPB symbiotic fungus used to simulate beetle attack-inoculations. Overall, lodgepole pine had higher limonene and myrcene, but lower α-pinene, concentrations than jack pine. However, myrcene concentrations in jack pine increased with inoculation density, while that in lodgepole pine did not respond to density treatments. We compared the growth and reproduction of MPB's symbiotic fungi, G. clavigera, Ophiostoma montium (Rumford) von Arx and Leptographium longiclavatum Lee, Kim and Breuil, grown on media amended with myrcene, α-pinene and limonene at concentrations reflecting two induction levels from each pine species. Myrcene and α-pinene amendments inhibited the growth but stimulated the reproduction of G. clavigera, whereas limonene stimulated its growth while inhibiting its reproduction. However, the growth and reproduction of the other fungi were generally stimulated by monoterpene amendments. Overall, our results suggest that jack pine rapid induction could promote MPB aggregation due to high levels of α-pinene (pheromone precursor), a positive feedback of myrcene (pheromone synergist) and low levels of limonene (resistance). Jack pine is likely as susceptible to MPB-vectored fungi as lodgepole pine, indicating that jack pine induction will likely not adversely affect symbiont activities enough to inhibit the invasion of MPB into jack pine forests.
化学诱导可以使树木更容易受到攻击昆虫和真菌的侵袭,并扩大其宿主范围。最近,山松甲虫(Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins;MPB)已经将其宿主范围从历史上的宿主花旗松(Pinus contorta var. latifolia Douglas ex Loudon)扩展到了加拿大西部的黑云杉(Pinus banksiana Lamb)。甲虫在黑云杉林中的成功可能取决于树木化学物质对 MPB 及其共生植物病原菌的适宜性。特别是,黑云杉的快速诱导防御如何影响 MPB 的定殖以及甲虫的共生体还不得而知。在野外,我们对不同密度的 Grosmannia clavigera(Robinson-Jeffery 和 Davidson)接种物(一种用于模拟甲虫攻击的 MPB 共生真菌)在花旗松和黑云杉中快速诱导韧皮部单萜的差异进行了特征描述和比较。总体而言,花旗松的柠檬烯和薄荷醇浓度较高,但 α-蒎烯浓度较低。然而,随着接种密度的增加,黑云杉的薄荷醇浓度增加,而花旗松的薄荷醇浓度则没有对密度处理做出响应。我们比较了 MPB 共生真菌 Grosmannia clavigera、Ophiostoma montium(Rumford)von Arx 和 Leptographium longiclavatum Lee、Kim 和 Breuil 的生长和繁殖,这些真菌是在含有浓度反映两种诱导水平的 myrcene、α-pinene 和 limonene 的培养基上生长的每个松树物种。myrcene 和 α-pinene 添加剂抑制了 Grosmannia clavigera 的生长,但刺激了其繁殖,而 limonene 则刺激了其生长,同时抑制了其繁殖。然而,其他真菌的生长和繁殖通常受到单萜添加剂的刺激。总体而言,我们的结果表明,黑云杉的快速诱导可能会由于高水平的α-蒎烯(信息素前体)、myrcene(信息素增效剂)的正反馈和低水平的柠檬烯(抗性)而促进 MPB 的聚集。黑云杉可能像花旗松一样容易受到由 MPB 传播的真菌的影响,这表明黑云杉的诱导不太可能对共生体活动产生不利影响,足以抑制 MPB 入侵黑云杉林。