Lubberts Bart, Guss Daniel, Vopat Bryan G, Wolf Jonathon C, Moon Daniel K, DiGiovanni Christopher W
Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017 Dec;50:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
To assist with visualization, orthopaedic surgeons often apply ankle distraction during arthroscopic procedures. The study aimed to investigate whether ankle distraction suppresses fibular motion in cadaveric specimens with an unstable syndesmotic injury.
Fourteen fresh-frozen above knee specimens underwent arthroscopic assessment with 1) intact ligaments, 2) after sectioning of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, the interosseous ligament, and the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament, and 3) after sectioning of the deep and superficial deltoid ligament. In all scenarios, the lateral hook test, anterior-posterior hook test, and posterior-anterior hook test were applied. Each test was performed with and without ankle distraction. Coronal plane anterior and posterior tibiofibular diastasis as well as sagittal plane tibiofibular translation due to the applied load were arthroscopically measured.
Tibiofibular diastasis in the coronal plane, as measured at both the anterior and posterior third of the incisura, was found to be significantly less when ankle distraction was applied, as compared to arthroscopic evaluation in the absence of distraction. In contrast, measurement of sagittal plane tibiofibular translation was not affected by ankle distraction.
Since arthroscopic findings of syndesmotic instability are subtle the differential values of the syndesmotic measurements taken on and off distraction are clinically relevant. To optimally assess syndesmotic instability one should evaluate the syndesmosis without distraction or focus on fibular motion in the sagittal plane when distraction is required.
为便于观察,骨科医生常在关节镜手术中对踝关节进行牵引。本研究旨在调查踝关节牵引是否能抑制尸体标本中存在下胫腓联合损伤不稳定时腓骨的移动。
14个新鲜冷冻的膝关节以上标本接受关节镜评估,评估情况如下:1)韧带完整;2)切断下胫腓前韧带、骨间韧带和下胫腓后韧带后;3)切断三角韧带深浅层后。在所有情况下,均应用外侧钩试验、前后钩试验和后前钩试验。每个试验均在有和无踝关节牵引的情况下进行。通过关节镜测量由于施加负荷导致的冠状面胫腓骨前后分离以及矢状面胫腓骨移位情况。
与无牵引的关节镜评估相比,在切迹前后三分之一处测量时发现,应用踝关节牵引时冠状面胫腓骨分离明显更小。相比之下,矢状面胫腓骨移位的测量不受踝关节牵引的影响。
由于下胫腓联合不稳定的关节镜检查结果不明显,牵引时和不牵引时所进行的下胫腓联合测量的差异值具有临床意义。为了最佳地评估下胫腓联合不稳定,在不需要牵引时应在无牵引的情况下评估下胫腓联合,或者在需要牵引时关注矢状面的腓骨移动情况。