IAE Business School, Mariano Acosta 1600, B1629WWA Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
School of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University, Kackertstrasse 7, Room B136, 1st Floor, 52072 Aachen, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Nov;192:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.09.038. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Governments around the world seek to design policies that enhance the innovative capacity of public service. Hence, identifying the underlying meanings attributed to innovation concepts in public policies is critical, as these very understandings inform not only the policy discourses, but also the overall institutional landscape regulating innovation activities. This paper examines such fundamental definitional aspects in the specific context of the National Health Service in England. For this purpose, it traces the evolution of the innovation concept in policy discourse based on the analysis of 21 key policy documents published or commissioned by the English Department of Health between 1948 and 2015. Systematic analysis of these texts reveals that policymakers' conception of healthcare innovation broadened considerably over time. English health innovation policy initially focused on basic biomedical research. Subsequently, it entered a transitional period, zeroing in on science- and technology-based innovation. Finally, this focus gradually shifted to a broader conception of innovation translating into health, economic, and service design benefits.
各国政府都在寻求制定能够提高公共服务创新能力的政策。因此,确定公共政策中创新概念的基本含义至关重要,因为这些理解不仅影响政策话语,而且影响规范创新活动的整个制度环境。本文在英格兰国民保健制度的特定背景下考察了这些基本的定义方面。为此,它根据对 1948 年至 2015 年间英国卫生部发布或委托的 21 份关键政策文件的分析,追溯了政策话语中创新概念的演变。对这些文本的系统分析表明,政策制定者对医疗保健创新的概念随着时间的推移有了相当大的扩展。英国卫生创新政策最初侧重于基础生物医学研究。随后,它进入了一个过渡时期,专注于基于科学和技术的创新。最后,这种关注逐渐转向更广泛的创新概念,转化为健康、经济和服务设计效益。