Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Nov;45(11):1875-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
Posttraumatic edema in facial bone fracture patients may interfere with the operation field and delay the schedule. Thus, swiftly reducing the edema alleviates patient discomfort and advances the operation date. Ice packing and compression bandages are often used for such a purpose, but such methods are often inconvenient for the face. In this study, we aim to analyze the effect of light-emitting diode (LED) (590/830 nm)-based low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in posttraumatic edema in facial bone fracture patients.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of 40 patients who were admitted to a single institution for facial bone fracture. The patients were divided into two groups of 20 each, treated either with LLLT or with sham treatment light. We used an LLLT device that consists of planar LED-based arrays with double wavelengths 590 nm and 830 nm. The patients were treated with either true or sham light from posttraumatic day 1-5, twice a day. After each treatment, the volume of a patient's face was measured with a 3-dimensional camera. We analyzed and compared the changes in facial edema. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was conducted for statistical comparison of the two groups, and significance was set to the level of p < 0.05.
The sex ratio and mean age of the two groups were of little difference. The fracture sites included the nasal bone, orbital wall, zygomaticomaxillary bone, mandible, and frontal sinus. Mechanisms of injury included fall, assault, traffic accident, sports, and gunshot. The total operation rate of both groups was equal to 85%. Our analysis showed a 16.5% reduction of edema in the LLLT group and 7.3% in the sham light group. The edema reduction was statistically significantly greater in the LLLT group than in the sham light group (p < 0.047).
LED-based LLLT is recently receiving attention worldwide for its cost-effectiveness and large coverage area compared to traditional laser therapy. Recent studies support its effectiveness in various areas such as wound healing, skin rejuvenation, and pain alleviation. In this study, we treated facial bone fracture patients with LED-based LLLT, and showed its effectiveness in reducing posttraumatic edema.
面部骨折患者的创伤后水肿可能会干扰手术视野并延迟手术时间。因此,迅速减轻水肿可以减轻患者的不适并提前手术日期。冰敷和加压绷带常用于此目的,但这些方法对面部往往不太方便。在本研究中,我们旨在分析发光二极管(LED)(590/830nm)-基于低水平激光疗法(LLLT)在面部骨折患者创伤后水肿中的作用。
我们对一家机构收治的 40 例面部骨折患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。将患者分为两组,每组 20 例,分别接受 LLLT 或假光治疗。我们使用一种由双波长 590nm 和 830nm 的平面 LED 阵列组成的 LLLT 装置。患者从创伤后第 1-5 天每天接受两次真光或假光治疗。每次治疗后,使用三维摄像机测量患者面部的体积。我们分析并比较了面部水肿的变化。对两组进行 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行统计学比较,显著性水平设为 p<0.05。
两组的性别比例和平均年龄差异不大。骨折部位包括鼻骨、眼眶壁、颧骨上颌骨、下颌骨和额窦。受伤机制包括跌倒、殴打、交通事故、运动和枪击。两组的总手术率均为 85%。我们的分析显示,LLLT 组水肿减少 16.5%,假光组减少 7.3%。LLLT 组的水肿减少明显大于假光组(p<0.047)。
与传统激光治疗相比,基于 LED 的 LLLT 具有成本效益高、覆盖面积大的特点,近年来在全球范围内受到关注。最近的研究支持其在伤口愈合、皮肤年轻化和缓解疼痛等各个领域的有效性。在这项研究中,我们用基于 LED 的 LLLT 治疗面部骨折患者,显示其在减轻创伤后水肿方面的有效性。