Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif.
Division of Allergy and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1266-1273.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are a common impediment to paclitaxel therapy. Management strategies to guide care after a paclitaxel-induced HSR are needed.
The objective was to evaluate the utility and safety of risk stratification on the basis of severity of the initial HSR.
A risk stratification pathway was developed on the basis of a retrospective review of the management and outcome of 130 patients with paclitaxel-induced HSRs at Massachusetts General Hospital. This pathway was then studied prospectively in patients referred to Allergy/Immunology with paclitaxel-induced HSRs.
The study population (n = 35) had a mean age of 56.1 ± 12 years and most were women (n = 33 [94%]). All 5 patients (15%) with grade 1 initial HSRs were successfully reexposed to paclitaxel, 1 patient at the standard infusion rate and 4 patients at 50% of the standard infusion rate. Thirty patients (85%) with grade 2 to 4 initial HSRs underwent initial paclitaxel desensitization based on the risk stratification pathway. No patients developed severe HSRs using the pathway. Eleven (31%) patients had HSRs that were mild to moderate in nature (grade 1, n = 4 [11%]; grade 2, n = 6 [17%]; grade 3, n = 1 [3%]) during their first desensitization. Sixteen (46%) of the 35 patients safely returned to the outpatient infusion setting for paclitaxel treatment at 50% of the standard infusion rate. Seven (20%) discontinued paclitaxel before the completion of the risk stratification pathway because of disease progression, completion of therapy, or death.
A management strategy using the initial HSR severity for risk stratification allowed patients to receive paclitaxel safely.
过敏反应(HSR)是紫杉醇治疗的常见障碍。需要制定指导紫杉醇诱导的 HSR 后护理的管理策略。
评估基于初始 HSR 严重程度进行风险分层的效用和安全性。
基于马萨诸塞州综合医院 130 例紫杉醇诱导的 HSR 患者管理和结局的回顾性研究,制定了风险分层途径。然后在因紫杉醇诱导的 HSR 就诊于过敏/免疫科的患者中前瞻性研究该途径。
研究人群(n=35)的平均年龄为 56.1±12 岁,大多数为女性(n=33 [94%])。所有 5 例(15%)初始 HSR 为 1 级的患者均成功重新接受紫杉醇治疗,1 例按标准输注率,4 例按标准输注率的 50%。30 例(85%)初始 HSR 为 2 级至 4 级的患者根据风险分层途径进行初始紫杉醇脱敏治疗。该途径未发生严重 HSR。11 例(31%)患者首次脱敏期间 HSR 为轻度至中度(1 级,n=4 [11%];2 级,n=6 [17%];3 级,n=1 [3%])。35 例患者中有 16 例(46%)在 50%标准输注率的门诊输注环境中安全返回接受紫杉醇治疗。由于疾病进展、治疗完成或死亡,7 例(20%)患者在完成风险分层途径前停止使用紫杉醇。
使用初始 HSR 严重程度进行风险分层的管理策略可使患者安全接受紫杉醇治疗。