• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) grading scale for immediate drug reactions.美国药物过敏登记处(USDAR)即时药物反应分级量表。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;152(6):1581-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
2
A Guide to Pediatric Antibiotic Allergy Testing: A Report From the US Drug Allergy Registry.《儿科抗生素过敏检测指南:来自美国药物过敏登记处的报告》
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 May;13(5):1018-1026.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.036. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
3
Allergy to betalactam antibiotics in children: results of a 20-year study based on clinical history, skin and challenge tests.儿童对β内酰胺类抗生素的过敏反应:基于临床病史、皮肤和激发试验的 20 年研究结果。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Jun;22(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01169.x. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
4
Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in children.儿童对β-内酰胺类抗生素的过敏反应。
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4):e45. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.4.e45.
5
Drug allergy in older adults: A study from the United States Drug Allergy Registry.老年人药物过敏:来自美国药物过敏登记处的一项研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Nov;131(5):628-636.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.024. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
6
Risk Factors of Challenge-Proven Beta-Lactam Allergy in Children with Immediate and Non-Immediate Mild Cutaneous Reactions.有即时和非即时轻度皮肤反应的儿童经挑战证实的β-内酰胺类过敏的危险因素。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(6):539-549. doi: 10.1159/000529084. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
Negative Predictive Value of Single-Day Drug Provocation Test for Immediate and Non-Immediate Beta-Lactam Hypersensitivity Reactions in Children.儿童单日药物激发试验对速发型和非速发型β-内酰胺类药物超敏反应的阴性预测值
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(2):150-158. doi: 10.1159/000540796. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
8
Clinical Relevance of Specific IgE in Penicillin Allergy Investigation.特异性IgE在青霉素过敏调查中的临床相关性
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2025;186(4):303-310. doi: 10.1159/000541243. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
[Hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics].[对β-内酰胺类抗生素的超敏反应]
Rev Med Interne. 2017 Nov;38(11):737-748. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Clinical presentation and time course in hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams.β-内酰胺类药物过敏反应的临床表现及病程
Allergy. 2007 Aug;62(8):872-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01463.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.肿瘤学中的性别平等教育:血液肿瘤学 fellowship 项目主任的调查研究
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02591-5.
2
Role of anti-IgE in immediate drug allergy.抗IgE在速发型药物过敏中的作用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan;155(1):84-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.09.021. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
3
A Skin Testing Strategy for Non-IgE-Mediated Reactions Associated With Vancomycin.一种用于治疗与万古霉素相关的非 IgE 介导反应的皮肤测试策略。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Nov;12(11):3025-3033.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.07.028. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
First-Line Antituberculosis Drug Challenge Reactions in Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome in an HIV Endemic Setting.HIV 流行地区药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状综合征中一线抗结核药物挑战反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Oct;12(10):2798-2808.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.045. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: allergen exposure, epidemiology, and diagnosis of anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia.日本围手术期过敏症的流行病学研究,一项前瞻性全国性研究:全身麻醉期间的过敏原暴露、流行病学和过敏反应的诊断。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul;131(1):159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Racial Disparity in Oxygen Saturation Measurements by Pulse Oximetry: Evidence and Implications.脉搏血氧仪测量氧饱和度的种族差异:证据与影响。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Dec;19(12):1951-1964. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202203-270CME.
3
Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update.药物过敏:2022年实践参数更新
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
4
Drug provocation tests with hypnotics, opioids, and neuromuscular blocking agents in the diagnosis of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity.使用催眠药、阿片类药物和神经肌肉阻滞剂进行药物激发试验以诊断围手术期疑似过敏反应。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Nov;129(5):e119-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.039. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Updating the CoFAR Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions in Food Allergy.更新食物过敏中全身过敏反应的 CoFAR 分级量表。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun;149(6):2166-2170.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.789. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Diagnostic performance of serial serum total tryptase measurement to differentiate positive from negative allergy testing among patients with suspected perioperative hypersensitivity.连续检测血清总类胰蛋白酶在疑似围手术期过敏患者中鉴别过敏试验阳性与阴性的诊断效能
Clin Exp Allergy. 2022 Feb;52(2):334-344. doi: 10.1111/cea.14040. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统:一项多学科 Delphi 研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul;148(1):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Patient Characteristics and Concerns about Drug Allergy: A Report from the United States Drug Allergy Registry.患者特征与药物过敏担忧:来自美国药物过敏登记处的报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2958-2967. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
Drug-associated inducible laryngeal obstruction complicating penicillin allergy testing.药物相关的诱导性喉梗阻使青霉素过敏试验复杂化。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Nov;125(5):599-600. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.031. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Rapid desensitization to antineoplastic drugs in an outpatient immunoallergology clinic: Outcomes and risk factors.门诊免疫过敏诊所中抗肿瘤药物的快速脱敏:结果和风险因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Sep;125(3):325-333.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.04.017. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

美国药物过敏登记处(USDAR)即时药物反应分级量表。

United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) grading scale for immediate drug reactions.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.

Center for Drug Safety and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Dec;152(6):1581-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.018. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.018
PMID:37652140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10872843/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no accepted grading system classifying the severity of immediate reactions to drugs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to present a proposed grading system developed through the consensus of drug allergy experts from the United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) Consortium.

METHODS

The USDAR investigators sought to develop a consensus severity grading system for immediate drug reactions that is applicable to clinical care and research.

RESULTS

The USDAR grading scale scores severity levels on a scale of 0 to 4. A grade of no reaction (NR) is used for patients who undergo challenge without any symptoms or signs, and it would confirm a negative challenge result. A grade 0 reaction is indicative of primarily subjective complaints that are commonly seen with both historical drug reactions and during drug challenges, and it would suggest a low likelihood of a true drug allergic reaction. Grades 1 to 4 meet the criteria for a positive challenge result and may be considered indicative of a drug allergy. Grade 1 reactions are suggestive of a potential immediate drug reaction with mild symptoms. Grade 2 reactions are more likely to be immediate drug reactions of moderate severity. Grade 3 reactions have features suggestive of a severe allergic reaction, whereas grade 4 reactions are life-threatening reactions such as anaphylactic shock and fatal anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

This proposed grading schema for immediate drug reactions improves on prior schemata by being developed specifically for immediate drug reactions and being easy to implement in clinical and research practice.

摘要

背景

目前尚无被广泛接受的药物过敏即时反应严重程度分级系统。

目的

本文旨在介绍一种通过美国药物过敏注册中心(USDAR)专家共识制定的新的即时药物过敏反应严重程度分级系统。

方法

USDAR 研究人员旨在开发一种适用于临床和研究的即时药物过敏反应严重程度分级系统。

结果

USDAR 分级量表的严重程度评分为 0-4 级。无反应(NR)等级用于接受挑战但无任何症状或体征的患者,这将确认阴性挑战结果。0 级反应表示主要是主观抱怨,在药物过敏反应和药物挑战中均常见,这表明发生真正药物过敏反应的可能性较低。1-4 级符合阳性挑战结果的标准,可能被认为提示药物过敏。1 级反应提示有潜在的即时药物过敏反应,症状轻微。2 级反应更可能是中度严重的即时药物过敏反应。3 级反应具有严重过敏反应的特征,而 4 级反应则是危及生命的过敏反应,如过敏性休克和致命性过敏性休克。

结论

该即时药物过敏反应分级方案优于既往方案,因为它是专为即时药物过敏反应而制定的,且易于在临床和研究实践中实施。