• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业特征导致的癌症筛查差异。

Disparities in cancer screening by occupational characteristics.

机构信息

Surveillance and Health Services Research, Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Surveillance and Health Services Research, Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.012
PMID:28987332
Abstract

Cancer screening patterns according to occupation characteristics in the United States are not well known, but could be used to help inform cancer control efforts. We examined cervical (CC), breast (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) by occupational characteristics in 2010, 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) among eligible US workers (CC women 21-65years; n=20,997), (BC women ≥40years; n=14,258) and (CRC men and women ≥50years; n=17,333). Cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening prevalence among US workers was 84.0%, 68.9%, and 56.8%, respectively. Unadjusted prevalence ratios for cervical (PR=0.92, 95%CI 0.90, 0.94), breast (PR=0.86, 95%CI 0.83, 0.90) and colorectal cancer screening (PR=0.83, 95%CI 0.80, 0.87) were lower among workers in small (<25 employees) compared to large organizations (≥500 employees). People in food service, construction, production, and sales occupations were 13-26%, 17-28% and 9-30% less likely to be up to date with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening, respectively, compared to healthcare professionals. Adjustment for socioeconomic factors and insurance status eliminated most associations. Disparities in cancer screening by occupational characteristics were mostly attributed to lower socioeconomic status and lack of insurance. These findings underscore the need for innovative public health strategies to improve cancer screening in vulnerable populations.

摘要

美国的癌症筛查模式根据职业特点而有所不同,但可以用来帮助为癌症控制工作提供信息。我们在 2010 年、2013 年和 2015 年的国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)中,根据职业特征检查了合格的美国工人中(CC 女性 21-65 岁;n=20997)、(BC 女性≥40 岁;n=14258)和(CRC 男性和女性≥50 岁;n=17333)中,宫颈癌(CC)、乳腺癌(BC)和结直肠癌(CRC)的筛查率和患病率比值(PR)。美国工人中宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌的筛查率分别为 84.0%、68.9%和 56.8%。未经调整的宫颈癌(PR=0.92,95%CI 0.90,0.94)、乳腺癌(PR=0.86,95%CI 0.83,0.90)和结直肠癌筛查(PR=0.83,95%CI 0.80,0.87)的患病率比值在员工人数较少(<25 人)的小组织中低于员工人数较多(≥500 人)的大组织。与医疗保健专业人员相比,餐饮服务、建筑、生产和销售行业的人进行宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的可能性分别低 13-26%、17-28%和 9-30%。调整社会经济因素和保险状况后,大多数关联都消失了。职业特点导致的癌症筛查差异主要归因于较低的社会经济地位和缺乏保险。这些发现强调需要创新公共卫生策略,以改善弱势群体的癌症筛查。

相似文献

1
Disparities in cancer screening by occupational characteristics.职业特征导致的癌症筛查差异。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Socioeconomic and healthcare use-related determinants of cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening practice in the French West Indies.法属西印度群岛宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查实践的社会经济及医疗保健使用相关决定因素。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 May;27(3):269-273. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000329.
3
Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest.美国中西部社区健康社会决定因素指标与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618.
4
Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004-2006.满足服务不足妇女的宫颈癌筛查需求:2004-2006 年全国乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测计划。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Jul;21(7):1081-90. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9536-3. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
5
Examining cancer screening disparities by race/ethnicity and insurance groups: A comparison of 2008 and 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data in the United States.检查种族/民族和保险群体的癌症筛查差异:对美国 2008 年和 2018 年国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0290105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290105. eCollection 2024.
6
Prevalence of Cancer Screening Among Adults With Disabilities, United States, 2013.2013年美国残疾成年人癌症筛查患病率
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Jan 26;14:E09. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160312.
7
Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.美国癌症筛查实践的进展:2000年全国健康访谈调查结果
Cancer. 2003 Mar 15;97(6):1528-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11208.
8
Disparities in Meeting USPSTF Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Women in the United States.美国女性在符合 USPSTF 乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查指南方面的差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Apr 15;18:E37. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200315.
9
Trends in colorectal cancer screening disparities in people aged 50-64 years, 2000-2005.2000 - 2005年50 - 64岁人群结直肠癌筛查差异趋势
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Sep;35(3):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.021. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
10
Up-to-Date Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use in the United States, 2021.2021 年美国最新的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查检测应用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Oct 26;20:E94. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230071.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of cervical cancer screening and its associated factors in Africa: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.非洲宫颈癌筛查的接受情况及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析的综合综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2968. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24173-2.
2
Cervical cancer screening uptake in East Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.东非宫颈癌筛查的接受情况:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2831. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24094-0.
3
Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry.
日本劳动人口癌症生存率的职业差异:基于神奈川癌症登记处的10年生存率分析
Cancer Med. 2025 Jul;14(13):e71020. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71020.
4
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
5
Social Determinants of Health Framework to Identify and Reduce Barriers to Imaging in Marginalized Communities.健康的社会决定因素框架,以识别和减少边缘化社区中的影像障碍。
Radiology. 2024 Feb;310(2):e223097. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223097.
6
Predictors of cancer screening behavior of the working population in China based on the information-motivation-behavioral skills model.基于信息-动机-行为技巧模型的中国劳动人口癌症筛查行为预测因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;11:1112172. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112172. eCollection 2023.
7
Burden of occupational cancer in Brazil and federative units, 1990-2019.巴西及联邦单位职业癌症负担,1990-2019 年。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 6;26:e230001. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720230001. eCollection 2023.
8
Role of Occupation in Shaping Cancer Disparities.职业在塑造癌症差异中的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;14(17):4259. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174259.
9
Endoscopic Screening and Risk of Colorectal Cancer according to Type 2 Diabetes Status.根据 2 型糖尿病状况进行内镜筛查与结直肠癌风险。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Dec 1;15(12):847-856. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0305.
10
Cancer disparities related to poverty and rurality for 22 top cancers in Florida.佛罗里达州22种主要癌症与贫困和农村地区相关的癌症差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 22;29:101922. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101922. eCollection 2022 Oct.