Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Amalienstr. 5, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Amalienstr. 5, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
Fissure integrity (FI) plays a key role in selecting patients for interventional emphysema therapy. We investigated its interference with automated lobar segmentation in quantitative computed tomography (CT) and emphysema distribution.
CT was available for 50 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lobe segmentation was performed fully automated by software and corrected manually. FI was evaluated visually using a %-scale. The influence of FI on emphysema ratio (ER=percentage of lung volume with density values<-950 HU), mean lung density (MLD), emphysema and total volume of adjacent lobes was analyzed. Lobe-based results were compared with respect to FI.
Differences in ER in adjacent lobes for complete vs. incomplete fissures were 12.4% for the right horizontal, 0.2% and 3% for the right oblique and 4.4% for the left oblique fissure (all p>0.05). Results for emphysema comparing automated vs. manually corrected segmentation exceeded clinically acceptable values, but were not significantly affected by FI (p>0.05). The widest limits of agreement for ER and MLD were noted in the right middle lobe ([-14, 17.4%], [-22.4, 32.4 Hounsfield Units]).
Automated lobe segmentation and emphysema distribution are not significantly affected by FI. Manual correction of automated lobar segmentation is still recommended in severe emphysema.
裂隙完整性(FI)在选择介入性肺气肿治疗患者方面起着关键作用。我们研究了它对定量计算机断层扫描(CT)中的自动叶段分割和肺气肿分布的干扰。
我们对 50 名慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行了 CT 检查。采用软件进行全自动叶段分割,并进行手动校正。采用%-比例尺对 FI 进行视觉评估。分析 FI 对肺气肿比(ER=密度值<-950 HU 的肺体积百分比)、平均肺密度(MLD)、相邻叶段的肺气肿和总容积的影响。根据 FI 对基于叶段的结果进行了比较。
对于完整和不完整裂隙的相邻叶段的 ER 差异,右侧水平裂隙为 12.4%,右侧斜裂为 0.2%和 3%,左侧斜裂为 4.4%(均 p>0.05)。与手动校正分割相比,自动分割的肺气肿结果超出了临床可接受的范围,但不受 FI 的显著影响(p>0.05)。ER 和 MLD 的最宽一致性界限出现在右中叶([-14, 17.4%],[-22.4, 32.4 亨斯菲尔德单位])。
自动叶段分割和肺气肿分布不受 FI 的显著影响。在严重肺气肿患者中,仍建议手动校正自动叶段分割。