Suppr超能文献

根据发病年龄、胰岛自身免疫和空腹 C 肽对糖尿病的代谢风险特征进行分层。

Metabolic risk profiles in diabetes stratified according to age at onset, islet autoimmunity and fasting C-peptide.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;134:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Islet autoimmunity, age at onset and time to insulin treatment are often used to define subgroups of diabetes. However, the latter criterion is not clinical useful. Here, we examined whether an unbiased stratification of diabetes according to age at onset, fasting C-peptide and GAD autoantibodies (GADab) defines groups with differences in glycaemic control and markers of cardiometabolic risk.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A cohort of 4374 adults with relatively newly diagnosed diabetes referred to a Danish hospital during 1997-2012 was stratified according to age at onset above or below 30 years, fasting C-peptide above or below 300 pmol/l (CPEP or CPEP), and presence or absence of GADab (GAD or GAD). HbA, BMI, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine were evaluated.

RESULTS

GADab were present in 13% of the cohort. Age at onset was not associated with major differences between groups. Patients with insulin deficient diabetes (CPEP; n = 503) had higher HbA but otherwise lower cardiometabolic risk (lower BMI, BP, LDL, triacylglycerol, and ALT, and higher HDL) than both patients with latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA defined as GADCPEP; n = 327) and patients with type 2 diabetes (GADCPEP; n = 3544). Patients with LADA defined an intermediate group with higher HbA but otherwise lower cardiometabolic risk than patients with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that fasting C-peptide and GADab status, but not age at onset, define groups of patients with diabetes with clinically relevant differences in glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk.

摘要

目的

胰岛自身免疫、发病年龄和起始胰岛素治疗时间通常用于定义糖尿病亚组。然而,后一个标准在临床上并不实用。在这里,我们研究了根据发病年龄、空腹 C 肽和谷氨酸脱羧酶自身抗体 (GADab) 对糖尿病进行无偏分层,是否可以将血糖控制和心血管代谢风险标志物存在差异的患者分组。

设计和方法

我们对 1997 年至 2012 年期间丹麦医院就诊的相对新诊断为糖尿病的 4374 名成年人进行了队列研究,根据发病年龄是否超过 30 岁、空腹 C 肽是否超过 300pmol/L(CPEP 或 CPEP)以及是否存在 GADab(GAD 或 GAD)进行分层。评估了 HbA、BMI、血压(BP)、血脂谱、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和肌酐。

结果

该队列中 13%的患者存在 GADab。发病年龄与各组之间没有明显差异。胰岛素缺乏型糖尿病(CPEP;n=503)患者的 HbA 较高,但其他心血管代谢风险较低(BMI、BP、LDL、三酰甘油和 ALT 较低,HDL 较高),而成人隐匿性自身免疫性糖尿病(LADA,定义为 GADCPEP;n=327)和 2 型糖尿病患者(GADCPEP;n=3544)。LADA 患者处于中间组,HbA 较高,但其他心血管代谢风险低于 2 型糖尿病患者。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,空腹 C 肽和 GADab 状态,而不是发病年龄,可将糖尿病患者分为具有临床相关血糖控制和心血管代谢风险差异的亚组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验