Suppr超能文献

新药对多发性骨髓瘤一线串联自体移植-同种异体移植长期随访的影响。

Impact of New Drugs on the Long-Term Follow-Up of Upfront Tandem Autograft-Allograft in Multiple Myeloma.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Department of Oncology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Jan;24(1):189-193. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

Before the introduction of "new drugs," we designed a trial in which 162 newly diagnosed myeloma patients were biologically randomized to receive either an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) followed by a nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) or a double auto-SCT. Fifty-eight patients in the allo-SCT arm and 46 in the double auto-SCT arm completed the assigned treatment. At a median follow-up of 12.3 years from allo-SCT and 12.1 years from second auto-SCT, median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 in the allo-SCT arm and 3.9 years in the auto-SCT -arm (P = .007), whereas event-free survival was 3.6 and 1.5 years (P < .001), respectively. A subset of allo-SCT patients showed persistent molecular remission. Two-year cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was 67.2%. At 5 years, 39% of these patients were alive, disease-free, and off immunosuppression; 36.6% had relapsed and 12.2% were still on immunosuppression. Thirty-three of 58 patients (allo-SCT arm) and 39 of 46 (auto-SCT arm) relapsed at least once and were rescued with new drugs. In the allo-SCT arm, 2 patients in biochemical relapse did not reach clinical criteria for treatment. Overall 28 (90%) were treated with new drugs and 14 (45%) received donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). In 28 of 31 patients (90%) DLIs were given with new drugs. Median OS from first relapse was 7.5 years in the allo-SCT arm and 2 years in the auto-SCT arm (P = .01). Patients who received DLI showed significantly longer OS (hazard ratio, .38; P = .042) as compared with auto-SCT patients. This difference was slightly lower when only allo-SCT patients who did not receive DLIs were considered (hazard ratio, .56; P = .154). In summary, long-term disease-free survival and survival outcomes after treating relapse with new drugs with or without DLIs were better in allo-SCT patients.

摘要

在“新药”问世之前,我们设计了一项试验,将 162 名新诊断的骨髓瘤患者进行生物学随机分组,分别接受自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)后行非清髓性异基因干细胞移植(allo-SCT)或双自体干细胞移植(double auto-SCT)。allo-SCT 组中有 58 例患者和 double auto-SCT 组中有 46 例患者完成了规定的治疗。从 allo-SCT 到中位随访 12.3 年,从第二次 auto-SCT 到中位随访 12.1 年,allo-SCT 组的中位总生存期(OS)为 11.4 年,auto-SCT 组为 3.9 年(P = .007),而无事件生存期分别为 3.6 年和 1.5 年(P < .001)。allo-SCT 组的一部分患者表现出持续的分子缓解。allo-SCT 患者 2 年累积慢性移植物抗宿主病发生率为 67.2%。5 年后,39%的患者无病、无免疫抑制且存活;36.6%的患者复发,12.2%的患者仍在接受免疫抑制治疗。allo-SCT 组 58 例患者中有 33 例(allo-SCT 组)和 auto-SCT 组 46 例患者中有 39 例(auto-SCT 组)至少复发一次,并接受了新药治疗。allo-SCT 组中有 2 例生化复发的患者未达到治疗标准。总体而言,28 例(90%)患者接受了新药治疗,14 例(45%)患者接受了供者淋巴细胞输注(DLIs)。在 31 例患者中有 28 例(90%)接受了 DLI。allo-SCT 组患者从首次复发后的中位总生存期为 7.5 年,auto-SCT 组为 2 年(P = .01)。与 auto-SCT 患者相比,接受 DLI 的患者的 OS 显著延长(危险比,.38;P = .042)。当仅考虑未接受 DLI 的 allo-SCT 患者时,差异略低(危险比,.56;P = .154)。总之,allo-SCT 患者在接受新药或无 DLIs 治疗复发后,无病生存和生存结果更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验