Faltas Bishoy M, Gennarelli Renee L, Elkin Elena, Nguyen Daniel P, Hu Jim, Tagawa Scott T
Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jan;36(1):9.e11-9.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis is a highly aggressive disease with poor outcomes. Even with platinum-based chemotherapy, the median overall survival is 15 months and the 5-year survival is only 15%. The role of metastasectomy in urothelial carcinoma is currently undefined.
To examine the use and outcomes of metastasectomy in older patients with urothelial carcinoma in a large population-based dataset.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a SEER-Medicare study, and from 70,648 urothelial carcinoma patients who met inclusion criteria, we identified 497 patients who had at least 1 metastasectomy during a median follow-up of 40 months.
The primary study endpoints were metastasectomy use, the length of stay for metastasectomy, complications, and overall survival following metastasectomy. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and readmission rate following metastasectomy.
We identified 497 patients meeting inclusion criteria who had at least 1 metastasectomy during the study period including 24 patients who had more than 1 procedure resulting in a total of 523 metastasectomies. The median overall survival after the first metastasectomy was 19 months (95% CI: 15-23; interquartile range: 4-74). In this selected patient population, over a third of patients were alive at 3 years. In the 476 patients who had evaluable discharge dates, the median length of stay after metastasectomy was 7 days (IQR: 4-12), and 10% of patients had at least 1 complication within 30 days of discharge. Thirty-day mortality after metastasectomy was 10% (n = 53/523) and was largely driven by the mortality associated with resections of urothelial cancer brain metastases.
In well-selected patients with urothelial carcinoma with a reasonable life expectancy, resection of metastatic lesions is safe and is associated with long-term survival and potential cures.
膀胱、输尿管或肾盂转移性尿路上皮癌是一种侵袭性很强的疾病,预后较差。即使采用铂类化疗,中位总生存期也仅为15个月,5年生存率仅为15%。目前,转移灶切除术在尿路上皮癌中的作用尚不明确。
在一个基于人群的大型数据集中,研究老年尿路上皮癌患者转移灶切除术的应用情况及疗效。
设计、研究地点和参与者:我们进行了一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保研究,在70648例符合纳入标准的尿路上皮癌患者中,我们确定了497例在中位随访40个月期间至少接受过1次转移灶切除术的患者。
主要研究终点为转移灶切除术的应用情况、转移灶切除术的住院时间、并发症以及转移灶切除术后的总生存期。次要结局包括转移灶切除术后30天死亡率和再入院率。
我们确定了497例符合纳入标准的患者,他们在研究期间至少接受过1次转移灶切除术,其中24例患者接受了不止1次手术,总共进行了523次转移灶切除术。首次转移灶切除术后的中位总生存期为19个月(95%置信区间:15 - 23;四分位间距:4 - 74)。在这个选定的患者群体中,超过三分之一的患者在3年后仍然存活。在476例有可评估出院日期的患者中,转移灶切除术后的中位住院时间为7天(四分位间距:4 - 12),10%的患者在出院后30天内至少出现1种并发症。转移灶切除术后30天死亡率为10%(n = 53/523),主要是由尿路上皮癌脑转移瘤切除相关的死亡率导致的。
在精心挑选的预期寿命合理的尿路上皮癌患者中,切除转移灶是安全的,且与长期生存及潜在治愈相关。