Cao Hongjian, Zhou Nan, Fine Mark, Liang Yue, Li Jiayao, Mills-Koonce W Roger
Human Development and Family Studies, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA.
Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, China.
J Marriage Fam. 2017 Oct;79(5):1258-1277. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12415. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Meta-analytic methods were used to analyze 179 effect sizes retrieved from 32 research reports on the implications that sexual minority stress may have for same-sex relationship well-being. Sexual minority stress (aggregated across different types of stress) was moderately and negatively associated with same-sex relationship well-being (aggregated across different dimensions of relationship well-being). Internalized homophobia was significantly and negatively associated with same-sex relationship well-being, whereas heterosexist discrimination and sexual orientation visibility management were not. Moreover, the effect size for internalized homophobia was significantly larger than those for heterosexist discrimination and sexual orientation visibility management. Sexual minority stress was significantly and negatively associated with same-sex relationship quality but not associated with closeness or stability. Sexual minority stress was significantly and negatively associated with relationship well-being among same-sex female couples but not among same-sex male couples. The current status of research approaches in this field was also summarized and discussed.
采用元分析方法,对从32篇关于性少数群体压力对同性关系幸福感影响的研究报告中提取的179个效应量进行分析。性少数群体压力(综合不同类型的压力)与同性关系幸福感(综合关系幸福感的不同维度)呈中度负相关。内化性恐同与同性关系幸福感呈显著负相关,而异性恋歧视和性取向可见性管理则不然。此外,内化性恐同的效应量显著大于异性恋歧视和性取向可见性管理的效应量。性少数群体压力与同性关系质量呈显著负相关,但与亲密程度或稳定性无关。性少数群体压力与同性女性伴侣间的关系幸福感呈显著负相关,但与同性男性伴侣间的关系幸福感无关。还总结并讨论了该领域研究方法的现状。