Suppr超能文献

65 岁及以上老年高能骨盆骨折患者的死亡率。

Mortality After High-Energy Pelvic Fractures in Patients of Age 65 Years or Older.

机构信息

University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Barrington, IL.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;32(3):124-128. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001041.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To document in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates after high-energy pelvic fracture in patients 65 years of age or older as compared to a younger cohort.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 academic trauma center.

PATIENTS

Seventy consecutive patients 65 years of age and older treated for pelvic fracture resulting from high-energy mechanism from 2008 to 2011. A total of 140 patients 18-64 years of age were matched to the study population based on mechanism of injury and OTA Code 61 subtype for comparison.

INTERVENTION

Review of demographics, injury characteristics, hospital management, and mortality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mortality.

RESULTS

The overall inpatient mortality rate was 10%. The older cohort exhibited an inpatient mortality rate 3 times higher than the younger cohort (18.6% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.003). There was no difference in mortality 1 year post discharge (5.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.699). No significant differences in initial Glasgow Coma Scale or Injury Severity Score were identified (GCS 12.9 vs. 12.4, P = 0.363; ISS 24.7 vs. 23.4, P = 0.479). Multivariate analysis identified the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (P = 0.012) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-chest (P = 0.005) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, and CCI (0.005) and AIS-abdomen (0.012) for 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for mechanism of injury and pelvic fracture classification, we found that adults ≥65 and those with multiple comorbidities were more likely to die in the hospital than younger adults. However, mortality within 1-year postdischarge was low and did not differ between groups. This is in sharp contrast to the high rates of postdischarge mortality observed in elderly patients with a hip fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

与年轻患者队列相比,记录 65 岁及以上因高能骨盆骨折而住院和 1 年死亡率。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

城市一级学术创伤中心。

患者

2008 年至 2011 年,70 例连续接受高能机制治疗的 65 岁及以上骨盆骨折患者。根据损伤机制和 OTA 编码 61 亚型,共 140 例 18-64 岁的患者与研究人群相匹配。

干预

回顾人口统计学、损伤特征、医院管理和死亡率。

主要观察指标

死亡率。

结果

总的住院死亡率为 10%。老年组的住院死亡率是年轻组的 3 倍(18.6%对 5.7%,P=0.003)。出院后 1 年死亡率无差异(5.3%对 3.8%,P=0.699)。格拉斯哥昏迷评分和损伤严重程度评分无显著差异(GCS 12.9 对 12.4,P=0.363;ISS 24.7 对 23.4,P=0.479)。多变量分析发现,Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)(P=0.012)和简明损伤评分-胸部(AIS-胸部)(P=0.005)是住院死亡率的独立预测因素,CCI(0.005)和 AIS-腹部(0.012)是 1 年死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

在控制损伤机制和骨盆骨折分类后,我们发现年龄较大的患者(≥65 岁)和合并多种合并症的患者比年轻患者更容易在医院死亡。然而,出院后 1 年内的死亡率较低,且两组之间无差异。这与髋部骨折老年患者观察到的高出院后死亡率形成鲜明对比。

证据水平

预后 III 级。欲了解完整的证据水平描述,请参见作者说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验