Georgetown University, Center for Global Health Science and Security, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr Katz and Mss Vaught and Formentos); and The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia (Ms Capizola).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jul/Aug;24(4):380-384. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000699.
Quarantine is an important but often misused tool of public health. An effective quarantine requires a process that inspires trust in government, only punishes noncompliance, and promotes a culture of social responsibility. Accomplishing successful quarantine requires incentives and enabling factors, payments, job security, and a tiered enforcement plan. In this article, we examine the variation in state-level quarantine laws and assess the effectiveness of these laws and regulations. We find that most states allow for an individual to have a hearing (63%) and to have a voice in burial and cremation procedures (71%), yet are weak on all other individual rights measures. Only 20% of states have provisions to protect employment when an individual is under quarantine, and less than half have plans for safe and humane quarantines. Decision makers at the state and local levels must make a concerted effort to revise and update quarantine laws and regulations. Ideally, these laws and regulations should be harmonized so as to avoid confusion and disruption between states, and public health officials should work with populations to identify and address the factors that will support successful quarantines if they are ever required.
隔离是公共卫生领域中一项重要但经常被误用的工具。有效的隔离需要一个能够赢得政府信任、只惩罚违规行为、并促进社会责任文化的过程。实现成功的隔离需要激励和支持因素、支付、工作保障以及分层执法计划。在本文中,我们研究了州级隔离法的差异,并评估了这些法律法规的有效性。我们发现,大多数州允许个人(63%)进行听证,并对埋葬和火化程序发表意见(71%),但在所有其他个人权利措施方面都很薄弱。只有 20%的州有规定在个人被隔离时保护其就业,不到一半的州有安全和人道隔离的计划。州和地方层面的决策者必须共同努力,修订和更新隔离法律法规。理想情况下,这些法律法规应该协调一致,以避免各州之间的混乱和中断,公共卫生官员应该与民众合作,确定并解决如果需要隔离,支持成功隔离的因素。