Gallo A, Giuberti G, Bruschi S, Fortunati P, Masoero F
J Anim Sci. 2017 Sep;95(9):4172-4180. doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1630.
The study was performed on forages ( = 8), nonforage fibrous feeds ( = 10), and crop residues ( = 2). Samples were characterized for in situ NDF degradability (NDFD) at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 240 h of ruminal incubation. Then, samples were characterized for enzymatic NDFD by adopting a multistep enzymatic method consisting of a preincubation (PreInc) phase followed by enzymatic incubation (EnzInc) steps. In the PreInc phase, samples were incubated in a NaOH solution for 0, 30, 60, or 90 min. Then, in the EnzInc phase, samples were first incubated in a buffered enzymatic solution containing hemicellulase, cellulase, and Viscozyme L enzymes. Then, samples were incubated in a xylanase-buffered enzymatic solution. These 2-step EnzInc lasted for a total of 16 (8 h for the first enzymatic step + 8 h for the second enzymatic step), 32 (16 + 16 h), or 48 h (24 + 24 h). The enzymatic NDFD coefficients were increased by increasing both PreInc and EnzInc incubation times, and no PreInc × EnzInc interaction was observed, except for ryegrass hay. On average, enzymatic NDFD increased ( < 0.05) by 0.35, 0.54, or 0.68, respectively, for 30-, 60-, or 90-min PreInc compared with 0-min PreInc. The enzymatic NDFD increased ( < 0.05), on average, by 0.11 in 32-h EnzInc or 0.16 in 48-h EnzInc with respect to 16-h EnzInc. Enzymatic NDFD were used to predict in situ NDFD coefficients by adopting single regression equations. High coefficients of regression ( > 0.80, < 0.05) and low errors of prediction were measured when specific enzymatic conditions were performed to predict in situ NDFD at intermediate (from 24 to 48 h) ruminal incubation. Generally, worse regression performances were obtained when enzymatic NDFD were used to predict in situ NDFD evaluated after shorter or longer incubation times. The direct prediction of the rate of NDF degradation was not possible using enzymatic NDFD coefficients. Even if the proposed multistep enzymatic method appeared promising, further studies are required to improve enzymatic NDFD prediction ability within specific forage types or nonforage fibrous feeds.
本研究对草料( = 8)、非草料纤维饲料( = 10)和作物残渣( = 2)进行了实验。对样品进行瘤胃培养6、12、18、24、30、36、48、72、96、120和240小时后的原位中性洗涤纤维降解率(NDFD)测定。然后,采用多步酶解法对样品进行酶促NDFD测定,该方法包括预孵育(PreInc)阶段,随后是酶促孵育(EnzInc)步骤。在预孵育阶段,将样品在氢氧化钠溶液中孵育0、30、60或90分钟。然后,在酶促孵育阶段,样品首先在含有半纤维素酶、纤维素酶和Viscozyme L酶的缓冲酶溶液中孵育。然后,将样品在木聚糖酶缓冲酶溶液中孵育。这两步酶促孵育总共持续16小时(第一步酶促孵育8小时 + 第二步酶促孵育8小时)、32小时(16 + 16小时)或48小时(24 + 24小时)。酶促NDFD系数随着预孵育和酶促孵育时间的增加而增加,除了黑麦草干草外,未观察到预孵育×酶促孵育的相互作用。平均而言,与0分钟预孵育相比,30分钟、60分钟或90分钟预孵育的酶促NDFD分别增加( < 0.05)0.35、0.54或0.68。与16小时酶促孵育相比,32小时酶促孵育的酶促NDFD平均增加( < 0.05)0.11,48小时酶促孵育的酶促NDFD平均增加0.16。采用单回归方程,用酶促NDFD预测原位NDFD系数。当采用特定酶促条件预测瘤胃培养中期(24至48小时)的原位NDFD时,测得的回归系数较高( > 0.80, < 0.05),预测误差较低。一般来说,当用酶促NDFD预测较短或较长孵育时间后的原位NDFD时,则获得较差的回归性能。使用酶促NDFD系数无法直接预测中性洗涤纤维的降解速率。即使所提出的多步酶解法看起来很有前景,但仍需要进一步研究以提高特定草料类型或非草料纤维饲料中酶促NDFD的预测能力。