Ehlers Lars Holger, Jensen Morten Berg, Simonsen Katherina Beltoft, Rasmussen Gitte Sand, Braithwaite Jeffrey
Department of Business and Management, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Fibigerstraede 11, 9220 Aalborg, Denmar.
Department of Economics and Business, Aarhus University, Nordre Ringgade 1, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):693-698. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx090.
To evaluate attitudes towards accreditation and the Danish Quality Model (DDKM) among hospital employees in Denmark. Negative attitudes led the Danish Government to abolish accreditation in 2015.
A cross-sectional survey was carried out via web-based questionnaire.
All hospital managers, quality improvement staff (quality managers and employees), and hospital surveyors in Denmark; and clinicians (doctors and nurses) within nine selected specialties.
Overall response rate was 29% with 5055 of 17 646 valid responses included in the data analysis. The response rate was 82% (5055/6188) among respondents who clicked on the link in the mail containing the questionnaire.
A short questionnaire was designed using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 'strongly disagree' to 7 'strongly agree'. To compare mean values between respondent groups, regression analysis using dummy coding of respondent groups and calculation of standardized mean difference effect sizes were performed.
Overall attitudes were supportive, with physicians more skeptical. There were different patterns of attitudes in the five Danish regions and between medical professions. A small group of physicians was extremely negative.
Clinical attitudes are important, and can affect Government decisions. On the basis of our study, future attention should be paid to attitudes towards accreditation (and attitudes towards other means of quality improvement). Attitudes may reflect political agendas and impede the take-up of improvement programs, cause their demise, or reduce their effectiveness.
评估丹麦医院员工对认证和丹麦质量模型(DDKM)的态度。负面态度导致丹麦政府在2015年废除了认证。
通过基于网络的问卷进行横断面调查。
丹麦所有医院管理人员、质量改进人员(质量经理和员工)以及医院评审员;以及九个选定专业的临床医生(医生和护士)。
总体回复率为29%,数据分析纳入了17646份有效回复中的5055份。在点击包含问卷的邮件链接的受访者中,回复率为82%(5055/6188)。
设计了一份简短问卷,采用从1“强烈不同意”到7“强烈同意”的7点李克特量表。为比较受访者群体之间的均值,使用受访者群体的虚拟编码进行回归分析并计算标准化均值差异效应大小。
总体态度是支持性的,医生的怀疑态度更强。丹麦五个地区以及不同医学专业之间存在不同的态度模式。一小部分医生持极端负面态度。
临床态度很重要,会影响政府决策。基于我们的研究,未来应关注对认证的态度(以及对其他质量改进手段的态度)。态度可能反映政治议程,阻碍改进计划的采用,导致其失败或降低其有效性。