Suppr超能文献

沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的认知、态度和障碍

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers.

作者信息

Kabrah Saeed M, Abuzerr Samer, Flemban Arwa, Jambi Layal, Kabrah Ahmed, Alghamdi Saad, Alghamdi Saeed M, Alshareef Ahmad A, Melibary Seham M, Al-Ghamdi Dakheelallah Homoud, Filfilan Najeeb O, Ralsan Tahani S, Alzhrani Adel A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Medical Sciences, University College of Science & Technology-Khan Younis, Gaza P.O. Box 8, Palestine.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020183.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement is a strategic priority for all healthcare systems. However, the engagement of healthcare providers in pursuing accreditation plays a critical role in integrating standards into routine practice. Therefore, the current study assessed the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers towards using the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) standards among Saudi healthcare providers.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among a representative sample (364) of Saudi healthcare providers (both genders, aged 20-60) working at twenty governmental CBAHI-accredited hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study participants were selected using a cluster random sampling method. Data regarding the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Additional information regarding demographic-socioeconomic variables was obtained with an interview-based questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28.

RESULTS

A total of 364 healthcare providers participated in the current study. Of them, 54.4% were males, and 45.6% were females. Almost half (48.6%) of the study participants held bachelor's degrees. For the variables of age group, marital status, monthly income, and years of work experience, statistically significant associations were found between males and females (-value < 0.05). The means of overall item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers for perceptions and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards as a tool for quality improvement were 80.1%, 76.4%, and 72.0%, respectively. The highest item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers regarding the barriers that inhibit the hospital from obtaining the full benefit from the CBAHI accreditation was for the inexpedient IT tools (59.6%).

CONCLUSION

The current study's results demonstrated accepted perceptions and attitudes toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers. In addition, the identified barriers should be alleviated to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The findings also help clarify the accreditation operating process, which may be helpful to policymakers and stakeholders in making informed decisions on integrating accreditation standards.

摘要

背景

质量改进是所有医疗系统的战略重点。然而,医疗服务提供者参与追求认证在将标准融入日常实践中起着关键作用。因此,本研究评估了沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的看法、态度和障碍。

方法

本横断面研究于2023年在沙特阿拉伯20家获得CBAHI认证的政府医院工作的沙特医疗服务提供者(年龄在20 - 60岁之间,男女皆有)的代表性样本(364名)中进行。研究参与者采用整群随机抽样方法选取。使用经过验证的问卷评估沙特医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准的看法、态度和障碍的数据。通过基于访谈的问卷获取有关人口社会经济变量的其他信息。使用SPSS 28版进行统计分析。

结果

共有364名医疗服务提供者参与了本研究。其中,54.4%为男性,45.6%为女性。近一半(48.6%)的研究参与者拥有学士学位。在年龄组、婚姻状况、月收入和工作年限等变量方面,男性和女性之间存在统计学上的显著关联(p值<0.05)。参与研究的医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准的看法和态度以及将CBAHI标准作为质量改进工具的态度的总体项目同意率均值分别为80.1%、76.4%和72.0%。参与研究的医疗服务提供者认为阻碍医院从CBAHI认证中充分受益的障碍中,项目同意率最高的是不合适的信息技术工具(59.6%)。

结论

本研究结果表明沙特医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准有可接受的看法和态度。此外,应消除已识别的障碍,以提高沙特阿拉伯医院的质量、有效性和效率。这些发现还有助于阐明认证操作流程,这可能有助于政策制定者和利益相关者在将认证标准纳入决策时做出明智的决定。

相似文献

5
Enabling Factors for the Successful Implementation of the CBAHI Accreditation Program.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 1;16:2189-2199. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S422174. eCollection 2023.
7
The impact of Saudi hospital accreditation on quality of care: a mixed methods study.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Oct;32(4):e261-e278. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2373. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Quality of care in accredited and nonaccredited hospitals: perceptions of nurses in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2012 Aug;87(3-4):39-44. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000417998.98106.9d.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Six Sigma in Managing Medical Errors in the Electronic Drug Administration Record (EDAR) System.
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84864. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84864. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Integration of Electronic Invoices in Healthcare Finance: A Case Study of Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71712. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71712. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions.
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Oct 10;7(4):232-235. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-X5. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Evolution of the accreditation program for healthcare organizations in KSA: From present to future.
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Oct 21;19(1):130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.10.002. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

2
Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.
Health Equity. 2023 May 26;7(1):312-320. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0009. eCollection 2023.
3
Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study.
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 May 18;4(2):58-64. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-44. eCollection 2021 May.
6
The cost of a first and second hospital-wide accreditation in Flanders, Belgium.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Aug 2;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac062.
8
How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023 Jan-Mar;14(1):23-37. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090641. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
10
A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation.
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:46958020981463. doi: 10.1177/0046958020981463.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验