• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers.沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的认知、态度和障碍
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020183.
2
Assessment of the accreditation standards of the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions in Saudi Arabia against the principles of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua).根据国际医疗保健质量协会(ISQua)的原则,对沙特阿拉伯医疗保健机构中央认证委员会的认证标准进行评估。
Ann Saudi Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):386-9. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.67082.
3
Impact of the Accreditation Program of the Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions on the Safety Dimension of the Institute of Medicine Quality.沙特医疗机构认证中央委员会认证计划对医学研究所质量安全维度的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 28;16:1179-1190. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S410925. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessing the Presence of the Joint Commission International Accreditation Requirements in Western Saudi Arabia Hospital Pharmacies: A Cross-sectional Study.评估沙特阿拉伯西部医院药房联合委员会国际认证要求的存在情况:一项横断面研究。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_5_23. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
5
Enabling Factors for the Successful Implementation of the CBAHI Accreditation Program.成功实施CBAHI认证计划的促成因素。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 1;16:2189-2199. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S422174. eCollection 2023.
6
The attitudes of hospital directors towards normalising accreditation standards: A qualitative descriptive study for Saudi Arabia.医院院长对标准化认证标准的态度:沙特阿拉伯的定性描述性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Sep 13;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac070.
7
The impact of Saudi hospital accreditation on quality of care: a mixed methods study.沙特医院认证对医疗质量的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Oct;32(4):e261-e278. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2373. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
8
Outcome of the first Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) primary health care accreditation cycle in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯首个沙特医疗保健机构中央认证委员会(CBAHI)初级医疗保健认证周期的成果。
Saudi Med J. 2017 Nov;38(11):1132-1136. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.11.20760.
9
Quality of care in accredited and nonaccredited hospitals: perceptions of nurses in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯东部省份经认证和未经认证医院的护理质量:护士的看法
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2012 Aug;87(3-4):39-44. doi: 10.1097/01.EPX.0000417998.98106.9d.
10
Factors affecting compliance with national accreditation essential safety standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯王国遵守国家认证基本安全标准的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11617-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Six Sigma in Managing Medical Errors in the Electronic Drug Administration Record (EDAR) System.六西格玛在电子药物管理记录(EDAR)系统中管理医疗差错的有效性。
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84864. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84864. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Factors Associated with Non-Compliance with Healthcare Accreditation in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.沙特阿拉伯医疗保健认证不达标相关因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;13(6):580. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060580.
3
Integration of Electronic Invoices in Healthcare Finance: A Case Study of Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.电子发票在医疗保健财务中的整合:沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院的案例研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71712. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71712. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions.轻松获得认证:医疗机构分步指南。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024 Oct 10;7(4):232-235. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-24-X5. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Impact of JACIE accreditation on safety of patient care: healthcare providers perspective from a tertiary care stem cell transplant center in Saudi Arabia.欧洲细胞与基因治疗学会(JACIE)认证对患者护理安全的影响:沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗干细胞移植中心医护人员的观点
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Dec;59(12):1786-1788. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02387-z. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
6
Evolution of the accreditation program for healthcare organizations in KSA: From present to future.沙特阿拉伯医疗保健组织认证计划的演变:从现在到未来。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Oct 21;19(1):130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.10.002. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of link quality management on healthcare quality: a comparative study at The Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University.链接质量管理对医疗质量的影响:哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院的一项比较研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Sep 15;15(9):5930-5939. eCollection 2023.
2
Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System.理解在整个国家医疗体系中将公平性纳入质量改进的背景。
Health Equity. 2023 May 26;7(1):312-320. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0009. eCollection 2023.
3
Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study.印度质量管理专业人员对医院认证影响的认知:一项基于调查的多中心研究
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 May 18;4(2):58-64. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-44. eCollection 2021 May.
4
Impact of the Accreditation Program of the Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions on the Safety Dimension of the Institute of Medicine Quality.沙特医疗机构认证中央委员会认证计划对医学研究所质量安全维度的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 28;16:1179-1190. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S410925. eCollection 2023.
5
International approaches for implementing accreditation programmes in different healthcare facilities: a comparative case study in Australia, Botswana, Denmark, and Jordan.国际上在不同医疗机构实施认证项目的方法:澳大利亚、博茨瓦纳、丹麦和约旦的比较案例研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 May 13;35(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad026.
6
The cost of a first and second hospital-wide accreditation in Flanders, Belgium.比利时佛兰德地区首次和第二次全院范围认证的成本。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Aug 2;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac062.
7
Stakeholders' Perception of the Palestinian Health Workforce Accreditation and Regulation System: A Focus on Conceptualization, Influencing Factors and Barriers, and the Way Forward.利益相关者对巴勒斯坦卫生人力认证和监管系统的看法:关注概念化、影响因素和障碍以及前进道路。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 2;19(13):8131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138131.
8
How Do Accredited Organizations Evaluate the Quality and Effectiveness of Their Human Research Protection Programs?认可组织如何评估其人类研究保护计划的质量和效果?
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023 Jan-Mar;14(1):23-37. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090641. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
9
Factors affecting compliance with national accreditation essential safety standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯王国遵守国家认证基本安全标准的因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11617-7.
10
A Mixed-Methods Study to Explore the Impact of Hospital Accreditation.一项混合方法研究,旨在探索医院认证的影响。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:46958020981463. doi: 10.1177/0046958020981463.

沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的认知、态度和障碍

Perceptions, Attitudes, and Barriers towards the Use of Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) Standards among Saudi Healthcare Providers.

作者信息

Kabrah Saeed M, Abuzerr Samer, Flemban Arwa, Jambi Layal, Kabrah Ahmed, Alghamdi Saad, Alghamdi Saeed M, Alshareef Ahmad A, Melibary Seham M, Al-Ghamdi Dakheelallah Homoud, Filfilan Najeeb O, Ralsan Tahani S, Alzhrani Adel A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Medical Sciences, University College of Science & Technology-Khan Younis, Gaza P.O. Box 8, Palestine.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020183.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12020183
PMID:38255071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10815121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement is a strategic priority for all healthcare systems. However, the engagement of healthcare providers in pursuing accreditation plays a critical role in integrating standards into routine practice. Therefore, the current study assessed the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers towards using the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions (CBAHI) standards among Saudi healthcare providers.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 among a representative sample (364) of Saudi healthcare providers (both genders, aged 20-60) working at twenty governmental CBAHI-accredited hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The study participants were selected using a cluster random sampling method. Data regarding the perceptions, attitudes, and barriers toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Additional information regarding demographic-socioeconomic variables was obtained with an interview-based questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 28.

RESULTS

A total of 364 healthcare providers participated in the current study. Of them, 54.4% were males, and 45.6% were females. Almost half (48.6%) of the study participants held bachelor's degrees. For the variables of age group, marital status, monthly income, and years of work experience, statistically significant associations were found between males and females (-value < 0.05). The means of overall item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers for perceptions and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards and attitudes towards using CBAHI standards as a tool for quality improvement were 80.1%, 76.4%, and 72.0%, respectively. The highest item agreement percentage of the participating healthcare providers regarding the barriers that inhibit the hospital from obtaining the full benefit from the CBAHI accreditation was for the inexpedient IT tools (59.6%).

CONCLUSION

The current study's results demonstrated accepted perceptions and attitudes toward using CBAHI standards among Saudi healthcare providers. In addition, the identified barriers should be alleviated to improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The findings also help clarify the accreditation operating process, which may be helpful to policymakers and stakeholders in making informed decisions on integrating accreditation standards.

摘要

背景

质量改进是所有医疗系统的战略重点。然而,医疗服务提供者参与追求认证在将标准融入日常实践中起着关键作用。因此,本研究评估了沙特医疗服务提供者对使用医疗机构认证中央委员会(CBAHI)标准的看法、态度和障碍。

方法

本横断面研究于2023年在沙特阿拉伯20家获得CBAHI认证的政府医院工作的沙特医疗服务提供者(年龄在20 - 60岁之间,男女皆有)的代表性样本(364名)中进行。研究参与者采用整群随机抽样方法选取。使用经过验证的问卷评估沙特医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准的看法、态度和障碍的数据。通过基于访谈的问卷获取有关人口社会经济变量的其他信息。使用SPSS 28版进行统计分析。

结果

共有364名医疗服务提供者参与了本研究。其中,54.4%为男性,45.6%为女性。近一半(48.6%)的研究参与者拥有学士学位。在年龄组、婚姻状况、月收入和工作年限等变量方面,男性和女性之间存在统计学上的显著关联(p值<0.05)。参与研究的医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准的看法和态度以及将CBAHI标准作为质量改进工具的态度的总体项目同意率均值分别为80.1%、76.4%和72.0%。参与研究的医疗服务提供者认为阻碍医院从CBAHI认证中充分受益的障碍中,项目同意率最高的是不合适的信息技术工具(59.6%)。

结论

本研究结果表明沙特医疗服务提供者对使用CBAHI标准有可接受的看法和态度。此外,应消除已识别的障碍,以提高沙特阿拉伯医院的质量、有效性和效率。这些发现还有助于阐明认证操作流程,这可能有助于政策制定者和利益相关者在将认证标准纳入决策时做出明智的决定。