• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期 Barrett 肿瘤:荟萃分析。

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1383-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.038. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.038
PMID:28993137
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is not well established. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for the management of early BE neoplasia.

METHODS

Three online databases were searched. The Cochran Q test and I were used to test for heterogeneity. Pooling was conducted using either fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity across studies. For the main outcomes, potential sources of heterogeneity were evaluated via linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (501 patients, 524 lesions) were included. Mean lesion size was 27 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.9-33.1). Pooled estimate for en bloc resection was 92.9% (95% CI, 90.3%-95.2%). The pooled R0 (complete) and curative resection rates were 74.5% (95% CI, 66.3%-81.9%) and 64.9% (95% CI, 55.7%-73.6%), respectively. There was no association between R0 or curative resection rates and study setting (Asia vs West), length of BE, lesion characteristics, procedural time, or length of follow-up. The pooled estimates for perforation and bleeding were 1.5% (95% CI, .4%-3.0%) and 1.7% (95% CI, .6%-3.4%), respectively. Esophageal stricture rate was 11.6% (95% CI, .9%-29.6%). Incidence of recurrence after curative resection was .17% (95% CI, 0%-.3%) at a mean follow-up 22.9 months (95% CI, 17.5-28.3).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD for early BE neoplasia is associated with a high en bloc resection rate, acceptable safety profile, and low recurrence after curative resection. ESD should be considered as part of the armamentarium for the management of BE neoplasia.

摘要

背景和目的

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)在 Barrett 食管(BE)中的作用尚未得到充分确立。本荟萃分析旨在评估 ESD 治疗早期 BE 肿瘤的安全性和有效性。

方法

检索了 3 个在线数据库。使用 Cochran Q 检验和 I ² 检验评估异质性。根据研究间的异质性,采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行合并。对于主要结局,通过线性回归分析评估潜在的异质性来源。

结果

纳入了 11 项研究(501 例患者,524 处病变)。平均病变大小为 27mm(95%置信区间 [CI],20.9-33.1)。整块切除的汇总估计值为 92.9%(95% CI,90.3%-95.2%)。汇总的 R0(完全)和根治性切除率分别为 74.5%(95% CI,66.3%-81.9%)和 64.9%(95% CI,55.7%-73.6%)。R0 或根治性切除率与研究地点(亚洲与西方)、BE 长度、病变特征、手术时间或随访时间之间无关联。穿孔和出血的汇总估计值分别为 1.5%(95% CI,.4%-3.0%)和 1.7%(95% CI,.6%-3.4%)。食管狭窄发生率为 11.6%(95% CI,.9%-29.6%)。根治性切除后复发的发生率为.17%(95% CI,0%-.3%),平均随访 22.9 个月(95% CI,17.5-28.3)。

结论

ESD 治疗早期 BE 肿瘤具有较高的整块切除率、可接受的安全性和根治性切除后的低复发率。ESD 应被视为 BE 肿瘤治疗的手段之一。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期 Barrett 肿瘤:荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1383-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.038. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's early neoplasia: a multicenter study in the United States.经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗 Barrett 食管早期肿瘤:美国多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):600-607. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Complex early Barrett's neoplasia at 3 Western centers: European Barrett's Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Trial (E-BEST).3 家西方中心的复杂早期 Barrett 肿瘤:欧洲 Barrett 内镜黏膜下剥离试验(E-BEST)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):608-618. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
The safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation following endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia.内镜黏膜下剥离术后射频消融治疗Barrett肿瘤的安全性和有效性。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Mar 1;31(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox133.
5
Treatment Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Adenocarcinoma Originating from Long-Segment Barrett's Esophagus versus Short-Segment Barrett's Esophagus.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗长节段 Barrett 食管与短节段 Barrett 食管腺癌的疗效比较。
Digestion. 2018;97(4):316-323. doi: 10.1159/000486197. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Clinical outcome in patients treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Barrett's neoplasia.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗浅表性 Barrett 黏膜肿瘤患者的临床转归。
Endoscopy. 2015 Feb;47(2):103-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390982. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
Early esophageal cancer in Europe: endoscopic treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection.欧洲早期食管癌:内镜黏膜下剥离术的内镜治疗。
Endoscopy. 2015 Feb;47(2):113-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391086. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
8
Endoscopic submucosal dissection plus radiofrequency ablation of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合射频消融治疗肿瘤性 Barrett 食管。
Endoscopy. 2012 Dec;44(12):1105-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310155. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
9
A randomised trial of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for early Barrett's neoplasia.早期巴雷特肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术的随机试验
Gut. 2017 May;66(5):783-793. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310126. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
10
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Apr 7;34(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa081.

引用本文的文献

1
Surveillance and Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus: Results from a Portuguese Tertiary Center.巴雷特食管的监测与治疗:来自葡萄牙一家三级医疗中心的结果
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1159/000546857.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Endoscopic Techniques in Early Barrett's Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.早期巴雷特肿瘤中先进内镜技术的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与汇总分析
Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e86015. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Journey to complete remission of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia after ESD and EMR of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia.
巴雷特食管相关肿瘤经内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)后发育异常和肠化生完全缓解的历程。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 12;13:a24222815. doi: 10.1055/a-2422-2815. eCollection 2025.
4
Endoscopic resection of early esophageal neoplasia in patients with esophageal varices: a systematic review.食管静脉曲张患者早期食管肿瘤的内镜切除术:一项系统评价
Endoscopy. 2025 Jul;57(7):769-777. doi: 10.1055/a-2524-4148. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
5
Endoscopic Resections for Barrett's Neoplasia: A Long-Term, Single-Center Follow-Up Study.内镜下切除 Barrett 肿瘤:一项长期的单中心随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 30;60(7):1074. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071074.
6
Long- vs short-segment Barrett's esophagus-derived adenocarcinoma: clinical features and outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection.长节段与短节段 Barrett 食管源性腺癌:内镜黏膜下剥离术的临床特征和结局。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3636-3644. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10888-7. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and the Need for Rescue Surgery-A Multicenter Analysis.上消化道内镜黏膜下剥离术及补救性手术的必要性——一项多中心分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 6;12(21):6940. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216940.
8
The impact of endoscopic treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with Barrett's neoplasia: a scoping review.内镜治疗对 Barrett 肿瘤患者健康相关生活质量的影响:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):607-617. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03528-5. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
9
Assessment of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of early-stage gastrointestinal tumors in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.评估直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃肠道肿瘤后的延迟出血。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 21;29(19):2916-2931. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i19.2916.
10
Wide-field ESD for Barrett's adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction: technical approaches to facilitate en bloc R0 resection.胃食管交界处巴雷特腺癌的广角内镜黏膜下剥离术:促进整块R0切除的技术方法
VideoGIE. 2022 Oct 1;7(11):385-388. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Nov.