Department of Infection and Immunity, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Department of Infectious Diseases, St-Louis Hospital APHP, University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Lancet HIV. 2018 Jan;5(1):e23-e34. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30179-0. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Simplified regimens with reduced pill burden and fewer side-effects are desirable for people living with HIV. We investigated the efficacy and safety of switching to a single-tablet regimen of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus continuing a regimen of boosted protease inhibitor, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
EMERALD was a phase-3, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, international, multicentre trial, done at 106 sites across nine countries in North America and Europe. HIV-1-infected adults were eligible to participate if they were treatment-experienced and virologically suppressed (viral load <50 copies per mL for ≥2 months; one viral load of 50-200 copies per mL was allowed within 12 months before screening), and patients with a history of virological failure on non-darunavir regimens were allowed. Randomisation was by computer-generated interactive web-response system and stratified by boosted protease inhibitor use at baseline. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to switch to the open-label study regimen or continue the control regimen. The study regimen consisted of a fixed-dose tablet containing darunavir 800 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 10 mg, which was taken once per day for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with virological rebound (confirmed viral load ≥50 copies per mL or premature discontinuations, with last viral load ≥50 copies per mL) cumulative through week 48; we tested non-inferiority (4% margin) of the study regimen versus the control regimen in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02269917.
The study began on April 1, 2015, and the cutoff date for the week 48 primary analysis was Feb 24, 2017. Of 1141 patients (763 in the study group and 378 in the control group), 664 (58%) had previously received five or more antiretrovirals, including screening antiretrovirals, and 169 (15%) had previous virological failure on a non-darunavir regimen. The study regimen was non-inferior to the control for virological rebound cumulative through week 48 (19 [2·5%] of 763 patients in the study group vs eight (2·1%) of 378 patients in the control group; difference 0·4%, 95% CI -1·5 to 2·2; p<0·0001). No resistance to any study drug was observed. Numbers of discontinuations related to adverse events (11 [1%] of 763 patients in the study group vs four [1%] of 378 patients in the control group) and grade 3-4 adverse events (52 [7%] patients vs 31 [8%] patients) were similar between the two groups. There was a small non-clinically relevant but statistically significant (0·2 [SD 1·1] vs 0·1 [1·1], p=0.010) difference between the two groups in change from baseline in total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol ratio. Only one serious adverse event (pancreatitis in the study group) was deemed as possibly related to the study regimen.
Our findings show the safety and efficacy of single-tablet darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide as a potential switch option for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults with viral suppression.
Janssen.
对于 HIV 感染者来说,简化方案、减少药物负担和减少副作用是理想的。我们研究了改用达芦那韦、考比司他、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺的单片方案与继续使用强化蛋白酶抑制剂、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦富马酸酯的方案相比的疗效和安全性。
EMERALD 是一项 3 期、随机、活性对照、开放标签、国际、多中心试验,在北美和欧洲的 9 个国家的 106 个地点进行。如果 HIV-1 感染的成年人有治疗经验且病毒学抑制(病毒载量 <50 拷贝/毫升持续≥2 个月;在筛选前 12 个月内允许有一次病毒载量为 50-200 拷贝/毫升),并且有非达芦那韦方案治疗失败的病史,则符合入组条件。随机分组采用计算机生成的交互式网络响应系统,并按基线时使用强化蛋白酶抑制剂进行分层。患者随机分为(2:1)接受开放标签研究方案或继续接受对照方案。研究方案包括一片固定剂量的片剂,含有达芦那韦 800mg、考比司他 150mg、恩曲他滨 200mg 和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺 10mg,每天一次,持续 48 周。主要终点是通过第 48 周累计的病毒学反弹(确认病毒载量≥50 拷贝/毫升或过早停药,最后一次病毒载量≥50 拷贝/毫升)的比例;我们在意向治疗人群中测试了研究方案与对照方案的非劣效性(4%的差距)。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02269917。
该研究于 2015 年 4 月 1 日开始,第 48 周主要分析的截止日期为 2017 年 2 月 24 日。在 1141 名患者(研究组 763 名,对照组 378 名)中,664 名(58%)曾接受过五种或更多种抗逆转录病毒药物治疗,包括筛选性抗逆转录病毒药物治疗,169 名(15%)曾在非达芦那韦方案中出现过病毒学失败。通过第 48 周累计,研究方案与对照方案相比,病毒学反弹非劣效(研究组 763 名患者中有 19 名[2.5%],对照组 378 名患者中有 8 名[2.1%];差异 0.4%,95%CI -1.5 至 2.2;p<0.0001)。未观察到对任何研究药物的耐药性。与不良事件相关的停药人数(研究组 763 名患者中有 11 名[1%],对照组 378 名患者中有 4 名[1%])和 3-4 级不良事件(研究组 52 名[7%]患者,对照组 31 名[8%]患者)在两组之间相似。两组之间总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值的基线变化差异具有统计学意义但临床意义不大(0.2[SD 1.1] vs 0.1[1.1],p=0.010)。只有一例严重不良事件(研究组胰腺炎)被认为可能与研究方案有关。
我们的研究结果表明,达芦那韦、考比司他、恩曲他滨和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺的单片方案在治疗 HIV-1 感染的成人患者中具有安全性和疗效,作为一种潜在的治疗选择,病毒学抑制良好。
Janssen。