Suppr超能文献

[慕尼黑命名法III:根据风险分类:显著鳞状病变的随访]

[Munich Nomenclature III: classification according to risk : Follow-up for conspicuous squamous findings].

作者信息

Marquardt K, Ziemke P

机构信息

Praxis für Pathologie, Güstrower Str. 34, 19055, Schwerin, Deutschland.

, Potsdam, Deutschland.

出版信息

Pathologe. 2018 Feb;39(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s00292-017-0382-x.

Abstract

AIM

The present study evaluates the risk of progression of cytologic diagnoses which do not require immediate therapy but do need follow-up. The presented data can contribute to risk-adapted management strategies, according to Munich Nomenclature III.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and March 2016, 3396 women were diagnosed as group II-p, IIID1, III-p, IIID2, IVa-p, IVb-p, and V‑p and represent the study population. Follow-up information on all subsequent cytologic and histologic findings were collected up to July 2017. For the initial cytologic diagnosis, the cumulative risk of CIN2+ or CIN3+ and the risk for persistent pathologic findings was calculated.

RESULTS

The cumulative risk of CIN2+ for initial findings II-p, IIID1, III-p, and IIID2 is calculated as 7.3, 17.1, 46.3, and 62.4%, respectively, after a mean observation period of 24.4, 21.1, 15.6, and 14.3 months. The cumulative risk of CIN3+ (%) is determined as 5.0, 9.3, 37.6, and 45.8. For persistent cytologic diagnoses II-p, IIID1, III-p, and IIID2, the risk of CIN2+ increases significantly after the second result (0 to 3.6, 0.21 to 3.6, 7.2 to 58.3, and 8.1 to 64.7%). Risk of CIN2+ and CIN3+ for group III-p is significantly higher for women <35 years and <30 years compared with women of higher age. There are no significant age-dependent differences for findings II-p, IIID1, and IIID2.

CONCLUSIONS

The Munich Nomenclature III classifies cytologic findings according to risk. The diagnostic groups of the Munich Nomenclature III provide a solid basis for a risk-adapted clinical management, if the cytologic history of the individual patient is taken into account.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了那些虽不需要立即治疗但需要随访的细胞学诊断的进展风险。根据慕尼黑命名法III,所呈现的数据有助于制定风险适应性管理策略。

方法

2014年1月至2016年3月期间,3396名女性被诊断为II-p、IIID1、III-p、IIID2、IVa-p、IVb-p和V-p组,构成研究人群。收集了截至2017年7月所有后续细胞学和组织学检查结果的随访信息。对于初始细胞学诊断,计算了CIN2+或CIN3+的累积风险以及持续性病理结果的风险。

结果

在平均观察期分别为24.4、21.1、15.6和14.3个月后,初始检查结果为II-p、IIID1、III-p和IIID2的CIN2+累积风险分别计算为7.3%、17.1%、46.3%和62.4%。CIN3+的累积风险(%)分别确定为5.0%、9.3%、37.6%和45.8%。对于持续性细胞学诊断II-p、IIID1、III-p和IIID2,第二次检查结果后CIN2+的风险显著增加(从0至3.6%、0.21至3.6%、7.2至58.3%和8.1至64.7%)。与年龄较大的女性相比,年龄<35岁和<30岁的III-p组女性CIN2+和CIN3+的风险显著更高。对于II-p、IIID1和IIID2的检查结果,不存在显著的年龄依赖性差异。

结论

慕尼黑命名法III根据风险对细胞学检查结果进行分类。如果考虑个体患者的细胞学病史,慕尼黑命名法III的诊断组为风险适应性临床管理提供了坚实的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验