Livet Melanie, Yannayon Mary, Sheppard Kelly, Kocher Kelly, Upright James, McMillen Janey
3C Institute, 4364 S Alston Ave, Durham, NC, 27713, USA.
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 May;45(3):362-380. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0829-7.
This pilot study explored provider use of an online system, Centervention, to support the delivery of empirically supported school-based mental health interventions (ESIs); and associations between components of this system [resources, training, technical assistance (TA), feedback loops], implementation indicators, and student outcomes. Multilevel modeling data were collected from 39 providers implementing ESIs with 758 students. Training, TA, and progress monitoring predicted ESI adherence, and perceived value of resources and TA influenced student responsiveness. Greater adherence was predictive of better socio-emotional outcomes. Interviews with 15 providers illuminated how they used these four Centervention support strategies. Implications for digital implementation support research are discussed.
这项试点研究探讨了提供者对在线系统Centervention的使用情况,以支持基于实证的学校心理健康干预措施(ESIs)的实施;以及该系统的组成部分[资源、培训、技术援助(TA)、反馈回路]、实施指标和学生成果之间的关联。从39名实施ESIs的提供者和758名学生那里收集了多层次建模数据。培训、TA和进展监测预测了ESI的依从性,资源和TA的感知价值影响了学生的反应性。更高的依从性预示着更好的社会情感成果。对15名提供者的访谈阐明了他们如何使用这四种Centervention支持策略。讨论了对数字实施支持研究的启示。