Neurath Christopher, Beck James S, Limeback Hardy, Sprules W Gary, Connett Michael, Osmunson Bill, Davis Donald R
American Environmental Health Studies Project, Lexington, MA, USA.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;45(6):496-502. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12329. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
A paper published in this journal, "Measuring the short-term impact of fluoridation cessation on dental caries in Grade 2 children using tooth surface indices," by McLaren et al had shortcomings in study design and interpretation of results, and did not include important pertinent data. Its pre-post cross-sectional design relied on comparison of decay rates in two cities: Calgary, which ceased fluoridation, and Edmonton, which maintained fluoridation. Dental health surveys conducted in both cities about 6.5 years prior to fluoridation cessation in Calgary provided the baseline. They were compared to decay rates determined about 2.5 years after cessation in a second set of surveys in both cities. A key shortcoming was the failure to use data from a Calgary dental health survey conducted about 1.5 years prior to cessation. When this third data set is considered, the rate of increase of decay in Calgary is found to be the same before and after cessation of fluoridation, thus contradicting the main conclusion of the paper that cessation was associated with an adverse effect on oral health. Furthermore, the study design is vulnerable to confounding by caries risk factors other than fluoridation: The two cities differed substantially in baseline decay rates, other health indicators, and demographic characteristics associated with caries risk, and these risk factors were not shown to shift in parallel in Edmonton and Calgary through time. An additional weakness was low participation rates in the dental surveys and lack of analysis to check whether this may have resulted in selection biases. Owing to these weaknesses, the study has limited ability to assess whether fluoridation cessation caused an increase in decay. The study's findings, when considered with the additional information from the third Calgary survey, more strongly support the conclusion that cessation of fluoridation had no effect on decay rate. Consideration of the limitations of this study can stimulate improvement in the quality of future fluoridation effectiveness studies.
麦克拉伦等人发表在本期刊上的一篇论文《使用牙面指数测量二级儿童停止氟化对龋齿的短期影响》在研究设计和结果解读方面存在缺陷,且未纳入重要的相关数据。其前后横断面设计依赖于对两个城市龋齿发生率的比较:停止氟化的卡尔加里和维持氟化的埃德蒙顿。在卡尔加里停止氟化前约6.5年在这两个城市进行的牙齿健康调查提供了基线数据。将其与在两个城市进行的第二轮调查中停止氟化约2.5年后确定的龋齿发生率进行比较。一个关键缺陷是未使用在停止氟化前约1.5年进行的卡尔加里牙齿健康调查的数据。当考虑这第三个数据集时,发现卡尔加里龋齿增加率在停止氟化前后是相同的,因此与该论文的主要结论相矛盾,该结论认为停止氟化与对口腔健康的不利影响有关。此外,该研究设计容易受到除氟化以外的龋齿风险因素的混杂影响:这两个城市在基线龋齿发生率、其他健康指标以及与龋齿风险相关的人口特征方面存在很大差异,而且这些风险因素在埃德蒙顿和卡尔加里并未随时间平行变化。另一个弱点是牙齿调查的参与率较低,且缺乏分析以检查这是否可能导致选择偏差。由于这些弱点,该研究评估停止氟化是否导致龋齿增加的能力有限。结合来自卡尔加里第三次调查的额外信息来考虑该研究的结果,更有力地支持了停止氟化对龋齿发生率没有影响这一结论。考虑到这项研究的局限性可以促进未来氟化效果研究质量的提高。