Lancet. 1988 Jul 23;2(8604):179-83.
354 patients with multiple sclerosis were randomised to receive either azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg daily or placebo in a double-masked trial. During follow-up of at least 3 years only small differences emerged between the groups. After 3 years the mean deterioration in Kurtzke disability score was 0.62 in the azathioprine group and 0.80 in the placebo group, a difference of 0.18 (95% confidence intervals [CI] -0.15 to +0.52) and in the ambulation index it was 0.84 and 1.25, respectively, difference 0.41 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.80). After 3 years there had been slightly fewer relapses in the azathioprine group (average 2.2) than in the placebo group (average 2.5) but the difference of 0.3 (95% CI -0.2 to +0.9) was not significant. Although the results favour a small beneficial effect from azathioprine the benefit is so small that the use of azathioprine cannot be generally recommended for most patients with multiple sclerosis. Analysis of subgroups (by sex, age, severity, rate of progression, HLA status, relapsing or progressive course) has not revealed any that have shown clear clinical benefit.
354例多发性硬化症患者在一项双盲试验中被随机分配,分别接受每日2.5毫克/千克的硫唑嘌呤或安慰剂治疗。在至少3年的随访期间,两组之间仅出现了微小差异。3年后,硫唑嘌呤组Kurtzke残疾评分的平均恶化程度为0.62,安慰剂组为0.80,差异为0.18(95%置信区间[CI]-0.15至+0.52);在步行指数方面,分别为0.84和1.25,差异为0.41(95%CI0.03至0.80)。3年后,硫唑嘌呤组的复发次数略少于安慰剂组(平均2.2次对平均2.5次),但0.3的差异(95%CI-0.2至+0.9)并不显著。尽管结果显示硫唑嘌呤有微小的有益效果,但这种益处非常小,因此一般不建议大多数多发性硬化症患者使用硫唑嘌呤。对亚组(按性别、年龄、严重程度、进展速度、HLA状态、复发或进展病程)的分析未发现任何显示出明显临床益处的亚组。