• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绝育输卵管切除术:2011 - 2016年大型综合医疗保健系统中的实践变化

Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.

作者信息

Powell C Bethan, Alabaster Amy, Simmons Sarah, Garcia Christine, Martin Maria, McBride-Allen Sally, Littell Ramey D

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Northern California Gynecologic Cancer Program, San Francisco, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, and Kaiser Permanente Obstetrics-Gynecology Residency Program, San Francisco, California; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):961-967. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312
PMID:29016486
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utilization rate of salpingectomy for cesarean deliveries and postpartum and interval tubal sterilization procedures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record to identify women older than 18 years of age undergoing surgical sterilization from June 2011 to May 2016 in an integrated health care system. The primary objective is to describe the change in utilization rate of salpingectomy for tubal sterilization procedures over time and after a systemwide practice recommendation was issued in 2013. Rates of salpingectomy and tubal occlusion were calculated for each of the five 1-year intervals in the study. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, operating time, length of stay, readmission, and emergency department visits.

RESULTS

A total of 10,741 tubal sterilization procedures were identified. There was an increase in salpingectomies from 0.4% (8/1,938; 95% CI 0.2-0.8) to 35.5% (902/2,538; 95% CI 33.7-37.4) of tubal sterilization procedures performed over the study period (test for trend, P<.001). Salpingectomy instead of tubal occlusion increased at cesarean delivery from 0.1% (1/1,141; 95% CI 0.0-0.5) to 9.2% (125/1,354; 95% CI 7.8-10.9) (test for trend, P<.001); postpartum from 0% (0/124; 95% CI 0.0-3.0) to 4.5% (9/201; 95% CI 2.4-8.3) (test for trend, P=.003); and as an interval (nonpartum) tubal sterilization procedure from 1% (7/673; 95% CI 0.5-2.1) to 78% (768/983; 95% CI 75.4-80.6) (test for trend, P<.001). Median operative minutes was increased from 52 (95% CI 51-52) to 61.5 (95% CI 57-64), from 33 (95% CI 32-34) to 50 (95% CI 35-64), and from 30 (95% CI 29-30) to 33 (95% CI 32-33), respectively, for salpingectomy compared with tubal occlusion at cesarean delivery and postpartum and interval sterilization. Median blood loss was similar for salpingectomy and tubal occlusion at cesarean delivery (660 mL; 95% CI 600-700 mL compared with 700 mL; 95% CI 680-700 mL) and interval sterilization (both 5 mL; 95% CI 5-5 mL) but was more for salpingectomy postpartum (250 mL; 95% CI 200-500 mL compared with 200 mL; 95% CI 200-200 mL).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant increase in salpingectomy for sterilization from June 2011 to May 2016. In the final year of the study, salpingectomy accounted for 78% of interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization procedures and 9% of intrapartum and postpartum procedures.

摘要

目的

评估剖宫产术中输卵管切除术以及产后和非孕期输卵管绝育术的使用率。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,利用电子病历识别2011年6月至2016年5月在一个综合医疗保健系统中接受手术绝育的18岁以上女性。主要目的是描述输卵管绝育术中输卵管切除术使用率随时间的变化情况,以及在2013年发布全系统实践建议后的变化。计算了研究中五个1年时间段内每个时间段的输卵管切除术和输卵管结扎率。次要结局包括失血量、手术时间、住院时间、再入院率和急诊就诊情况。

结果

共识别出10741例输卵管绝育术。在研究期间,输卵管切除术在输卵管绝育术中的占比从0.4%(8/1938;95%CI 0.2 - 0.8)增至35.5%(902/2538;95%CI 33.7 - 37.4)(趋势检验,P<.001)。剖宫产术中输卵管切除术而非输卵管结扎的占比从0.1%(1/1141;95%CI 0.0 - 0.5)增至9.2%(125/1354;95%CI 7.8 - 10.9)(趋势检验,P<.001);产后从0%(0/124;95%CI 0.0 - 3.0)增至4.5%(9/201;95%CI 2.4 -

相似文献

1
Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.绝育输卵管切除术:2011 - 2016年大型综合医疗保健系统中的实践变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):961-967. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312.
2
Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与结扎术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002674.
3
Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与标准产后输卵管结扎术的可行性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):20-27. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002646.
4
Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?产后永久性绝育:双侧输卵管切除术能否取代双侧输卵管结扎术?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.择期和非计划性剖宫产时在产后避孕措施中施行机会性输卵管切除术。
Contraception. 2019 Jun;99(6):373-376. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.041. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
7
Technique for bilateral salpingectomy at the time of Cesarean delivery: a case series.剖宫产时双侧输卵管切除术技术:病例系列
Contraception. 2017 May;95(5):509-511. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术用于永久性避孕:结局和医生态度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):860-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中全双侧输卵管切除术与部分双侧输卵管切除术用于永久性绝育的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1185-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4340-x. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
10
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Salpingectomy versus tubal occlusion in laparoscopic sterilisation (SALSTER): a national register-based randomised non-inferiority trial.腹腔镜绝育术中输卵管切除术与输卵管阻塞术的比较(SALSTER):一项基于国家登记处的随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Aug 11;45:101026. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101026. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Sterilization of free-ranging female capybaras (): a comparison between two surgical techniques.野生雌性水豚的绝育():两种手术技术的比较。 (注:括号内原文内容缺失)
Anim Reprod. 2024 Sep 23;21(4):e20240053. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0053. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of salpingectomy versus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.
输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术对患者术后伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14543. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14543.
4
Histopathologic and Preneoplastic Changes in Tubal Ligation Materials.输卵管结扎材料的组织病理学和癌前变化。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2117. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122117.
5
Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial.普通人群卵巢癌筛查的死亡率影响、风险及益处:英国卵巢癌筛查协作试验(UKCTOCS)随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(10):1-93. doi: 10.3310/BHBR5832.
6
Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.剖宫产时实施绝育手术的种族差异。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e934-e938. doi: 10.1055/a-1974-9507. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Uptake and Predictors of Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction in the United States.美国降低卵巢癌风险的机会性输卵管切除术的接受情况和预测因素。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Dec;14(12):1101-1110. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0121. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.高资源国家中寻求永久避孕的女性的选择比较:一项系统综述
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01201-z.
9
Exploring Experiences with Sterilization among Nulliparous Women.探索未育女性的绝育经历。
Womens Reprod Health (Phila). 2020;7(1):36-48. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2019.1690306. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Prophylactic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术时预防性输卵管切除术预防卵巢癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):519-524. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11419. Epub 2020 Mar 4.