• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICD 注册研究患者心脏再同步治疗后胸腔内阻抗结果对生存和心力衰竭住院的长期影响。

Long-term impact of intrathoracic impedance findings on survival and heart failure hospitalizations after cardiac resynchronization therapy in ICD Registry patients.

机构信息

Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure, Medtronic PLC, 8200 Coral Sea Street NE, MVN61, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 1300 South 2nd Street, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux197.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eux197
PMID:29016777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6041970/
Abstract

AIMS

To determine adjusted associations among OptiVol® threshold crossings, long-term survival, and hospitalizations among heart failure (HF) patients with Medicare coverage in the United States.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cohort with OptiVol®-enabled cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) devices from the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry was linked to both Medicare claims/summary data and Medtronic's CareLink® Network data. An extended multivariable Cox model was used to analyse associations among OptiVol® threshold crossings (treated as time-dependent covariates), mortality, and HF-related hospitalizations (HFH). We analysed N = 1565 patients with OptiVol®-enabled CRT-D devices (mean age 72.8, 28% women). The median follow-up was 6.3 years. Patients with >15.1% of days above OptiVol® threshold (highest quartile) had more than a 4-fold increase in mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3-5.3] and more than a 3-fold increase in HFH (HR 3.2, 95% CI: 2.4-4.2) compared with patients having <4.1% of days above threshold (lowest quartile) after adjustment for key covariates. In addition, a single OptiVol® crossing was associated with significantly increased rates of both mortality (HR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.27-2.75) and HFH (HR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.28-2.27).

CONCLUSION

In a CRT-D cohort with over 6 years of follow-up, both single OptiVol® crossings and time above OptiVol® threshold were associated with increased rates of mortality and hospitalization, which has important implications for clinical care. This is the first study integrating device data with Medicare outcomes to validate the long-term significance of OptiVol® findings.

摘要

目的

在美国有医疗保险覆盖的心力衰竭(HF)患者中,确定 OptiVol® 阈交叉、长期生存和住院之间的调整关联。

方法和结果

从植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)登记处获得了配备 OptiVol® 的心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)设备的队列,并将其与医疗保险索赔/汇总数据以及美敦力的 CareLink®网络数据相关联。使用扩展的多变量 Cox 模型来分析 OptiVol® 阈交叉(视为时间依赖性协变量)、死亡率和 HF 相关住院(HFH)之间的关联。我们分析了 1565 名配备 OptiVol® 的 CRT-D 设备的患者(平均年龄 72.8 岁,28%为女性)。中位随访时间为 6.3 年。超过 OptiVol® 阈(最高四分位数)的天数>15.1%的患者死亡率增加了 4 倍以上[风险比(HR)4.2,95%置信区间(CI):3.3-5.3],HFH 增加了 3 倍以上[HR 3.2,95%CI:2.4-4.2],与阈下天数<4.1%(最低四分位数)的患者相比,在调整了关键协变量后。此外,单次 OptiVol® 交叉与死亡率(HR 1.87,95%CI:1.27-2.75)和 HFH(HR 1.70,95%CI:1.28-2.27)的发生率显著增加均相关。

结论

在 CRT-D 队列中,超过 6 年的随访,单次 OptiVol® 交叉和超过 OptiVol® 阈的时间都与死亡率和住院率的增加有关,这对临床护理具有重要意义。这是第一项将设备数据与医疗保险结果相结合以验证 OptiVol® 结果长期意义的研究。

相似文献

1
Long-term impact of intrathoracic impedance findings on survival and heart failure hospitalizations after cardiac resynchronization therapy in ICD Registry patients.ICD 注册研究患者心脏再同步治疗后胸腔内阻抗结果对生存和心力衰竭住院的长期影响。
Europace. 2018 Jul 1;20(7):1138-1145. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux197.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者心脏再同步治疗的比较效果:来自国家心血管数据注册中心植入式心律转复除颤器注册研究的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002324.
3
Facility-Level Variation and Clinical Outcomes in Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With and Without an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.使用和不使用植入式心脏复律除颤器的心脏再同步治疗中的机构层面差异与临床结局
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Dec;11(12):e004763. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004763.
4
Morbidity and mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacing vs. with defibrillation in octogenarian patients in a real-world setting.在真实环境中,对 80 岁以上患者进行心脏再同步治疗起搏与除颤的发病率和死亡率。
Europace. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):1357-1363. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw238.
5
Reduced long-term overall mortality in heart failure patients with prolonged QRS treated with CRT combined with ICD vs. heart failure patients with narrow QRS treated with ICD only.与仅接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗的窄QRS波心力衰竭患者相比,接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)联合ICD治疗的宽QRS波心力衰竭患者长期总体死亡率降低。
Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1374-82. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv347. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
6
Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Mild Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block.左束支传导阻滞的轻度心力衰竭患者接受心脏再同步治疗的长期预后的性别差异
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jun 29;4(7):e002013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002013.
7
Adding the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improved long-term survival in ischaemic, but not in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.在心脏再同步治疗中添加植入式心脏复律除颤器与缺血性心肌病患者的长期生存率提高相关,但与非缺血性心肌病患者无关。
Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):413-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv212. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Complications in recipients of cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insights from Silesian Center Defibrillator registry.心脏复律除颤器或心脏再同步治疗接受者的并发症:来自西里西亚中心除颤器登记处的见解。
Cardiol J. 2017;24(5):515-522. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0092. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
Amiodarone is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators.胺碘酮与升级为心脏再同步治疗除颤器的持续性室性心律失常患者的不良结局相关。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):348-356. doi: 10.1111/jce.13828. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Predictors for early mortality and arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator: A two center cohort study.心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者早期死亡率和心律失常事件的预测因素:一项双中心队列研究。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(6):711-716. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0144. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of dynamic atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy on cardiac function and neuroendocrine factors in patients with congestive heart failure.动态房室和室内延迟优化用于心脏再同步治疗对充血性心力衰竭患者心功能和神经内分泌因子的影响
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Feb 26;17(2):551-556. doi: 10.5114/aoms/131564. eCollection 2021.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Rehabilitation for Heart Failure Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心脏再同步治疗心力衰竭患者运动康复的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 21;11:980. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00980. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2017年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
2
Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.存在竞争风险时生存数据的分析导论
Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.
3
Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guides management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.无线肺动脉压监测指导治疗,以减少射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的失代偿情况。
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;7(6):935-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.001229. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2012年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心律学会对2008年心脏节律异常器械治疗指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1297-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
5
Threshold crossing of device-based intrathoracic impedance trends identifies relatively increased mortality risk.基于设备的胸腔内阻抗趋势的阈交叉识别出相对增加的死亡风险。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep;33(17):2189-96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs121. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
6
Intrathoracic impedance vs daily weight monitoring for predicting worsening heart failure events: results of the Fluid Accumulation Status Trial (FAST).胸腔内阻抗与每日体重监测对预测心力衰竭恶化事件的比较:液体蓄积状态试验(FAST)结果
Congest Heart Fail. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(2):51-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00220.x. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
Sensitivity and positive predictive value of implantable intrathoracic impedance monitoring as a predictor of heart failure hospitalizations: the SENSE-HF trial.植入式胸腔内阻抗监测对心力衰竭住院预测的敏感性和阳性预测值:SENSE-HF 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(18):2266-73. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr050. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
8
Implantable sensors for heart failure.用于心力衰竭的可植入传感器。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;3(6):657-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.959502.
9
Efficacy of fluid assessment based on intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with systolic heart failure.基于胸腔内阻抗监测的液体评估在收缩性心力衰竭患者中的疗效。
Circ J. 2011;75(1):129-34. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0730. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
10
Bundle-branch block morphology and other predictors of outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy in Medicare patients.医疗保险患者心脏再同步治疗后束支阻滞形态和其他预后预测因素。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 16;122(20):2022-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956011. Epub 2010 Nov 1.