Suppr超能文献

是否有证据支持手动和自动切换多记忆听力设备的附加价值及正确使用?一项范围综述。

Is there evidence for the added value and correct use of manual and automatically switching multimemory hearing devices? A scoping review.

作者信息

de Graaff Feike, Huysmans Elke, Ket Johannes C F, Merkus Paul, Goverts S Theo, Leemans C René, Smits Cas

机构信息

a Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Section Ear & Hearing , and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam , The Netherlands and.

b Medical Library , Vrije Universiteit , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2018 Mar;57(3):176-183. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1385864. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review literature on the use of manual and automatically switching multimemory devices by hearing aid and CI recipients, and to investigate if recipients appreciate and adequately use the ability to switch between programmes in various listening environments.

DESIGN

Literature was searched using PubMed, Embase and ISI/Web of Science. Additional studies were identified by screening reference and citation lists, and by contacting experts.

STUDY SAMPLE

The search yielded 1109 records that were screened on title and abstract. This resulted in the full-text assessment of 37 articles.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles reported on the use of multiple programmes for various listening environments, three articles reported on the use of an automatic switching mode. All studies reported on hearing aid recipients only, no study with CI recipients fulfilled the selection criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high number of manual and automatically switching multimemory devices sold each year, there are remarkably few studies about the use of multiple programmes or automatic switching modes for various listening environments. No studies were found that examined the accuracy of the use of programmes for specific listening environments. An automatic switching device might be a solution if recipients are not able, or willing, to switch manually between programmes.

摘要

目的

回顾关于助听器和人工耳蜗佩戴者使用手动及自动切换多记忆装置的文献,并调查佩戴者是否重视并能在不同聆听环境中充分利用程序切换功能。

设计

通过PubMed、Embase和ISI/Web of Science检索文献。通过筛选参考文献列表、引用列表以及联系专家来确定其他研究。

研究样本

检索得到1109条记录,经标题和摘要筛选后,对37篇文章进行全文评估。

结果

16篇文章报道了在不同聆听环境中使用多个程序的情况,3篇文章报道了自动切换模式的使用情况。所有研究仅涉及助听器佩戴者,没有关于人工耳蜗佩戴者的研究符合入选标准。

结论

尽管每年销售的手动和自动切换多记忆装置数量众多,但关于在不同聆听环境中使用多个程序或自动切换模式的研究却非常少。未发现有研究考察特定聆听环境下程序使用的准确性。如果佩戴者无法或不愿意手动切换程序,自动切换装置可能是一种解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验