Suppr超能文献

对酒精损伤的保护作用:生长抑素发挥作用吗?

Protective effects against alcohol insult: does somatostatin play any role?

作者信息

Agrawal N M, Godiwala T, Arimura A, Groot K, Dajani E

机构信息

Section of Gastroenterology, Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, LA 70112.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1988;64 Suppl 1:15-20.

PMID:2901743
Abstract

This study evaluated the cytoprotective properties of misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue and cimetidine, against alcohol-induced gastric mucosal injury and examined the role of increased gastric juice somatostatin in cytoprotection. Forty-give healthy adult male volunteers were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled endoscopic study. Screening endoscopy was done to exclude subjects with asymptomatic gastric mucosal abnormality. Misoprostol (200 micrograms) intragastrically, cimetidine (300 mg) orally or placebo were administered prior to ethanol challenge. Injury to the gastric mucosa was produced by spraying it with 80% ethanol solution instilled intragastrically. Endoscopic evaluation of gastric mucosa was conducted 15 and 30 minutes after ethanol by two endoscopists independently according to a seven-point scale. Thirty minutes following the instillation of ethanol, gastric contents were aspirated and analysed for immunoreactive somatostatin. The gastric mucosa of placebo-treated subjects showed marked damage with endoscopic score (mean +/- standard deviation) of 5.5 +/- 0.9. Cimetidine partially prevented gastric mucosal damage with endoscopic score of 4.5 +/- 1.7 as compared to placebo (P = 0.04). Misoprostol prevented significant gastric mucosal injury, (endoscopic score of 1 +/- 1.7) when compared to placebo (P = 0.0001) and to cimetidine (P = 0.0002). The gastric juice somatostatin concentration (pg/ml) was 75.79 +/- 13.59 in the misoprostol group, 64.71 +/- 8.06 in the cimetidine group and 34.34 +/- 5.66 in the placebo group. Both misoprostol and cimetidine showed significant (P = 0.05) increase in gastric juice somatostatin when compared to placebo treatment. The degree of gastric mucosal protection afforded by misoprostol was significantly greater than cimetidine. Since gastric juice somatostatin in the misoprostol group was not significantly different from the cimetidine group, it was concluded that gastric juice somatostatin is not solely responsible for the cytoprotective ability of misoprostol.

摘要

本研究评估了合成前列腺素E1类似物米索前列醇和西咪替丁对酒精诱导的胃黏膜损伤的细胞保护特性,并探讨了胃液中生长抑素增加在细胞保护中的作用。45名健康成年男性志愿者参加了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的内镜研究。进行筛查性内镜检查以排除无症状胃黏膜异常的受试者。在乙醇激发前,分别经胃给予米索前列醇(200微克)、口服西咪替丁(300毫克)或安慰剂。通过向胃内注入80%乙醇溶液来造成胃黏膜损伤。在乙醇注入后15分钟和30分钟,由两名内镜医师根据七点量表独立对胃黏膜进行内镜评估。乙醇注入30分钟后,抽取胃内容物并分析免疫反应性生长抑素。安慰剂治疗组的胃黏膜显示出明显损伤,内镜评分为(均值±标准差)5.5±0.9。与安慰剂相比,西咪替丁部分预防了胃黏膜损伤,内镜评分为4.5±1.7(P = 0.04)。与安慰剂相比(P = 0.0001)以及与西咪替丁相比(P = 0.0002),米索前列醇预防了显著的胃黏膜损伤(内镜评分为1±1.7)。米索前列醇组胃液中生长抑素浓度(皮克/毫升)为75.79±13.59,西咪替丁组为64.71±8.06,安慰剂组为34.34±5.66。与安慰剂治疗相比,米索前列醇和西咪替丁均使胃液中生长抑素显著增加(P = 0.05)。米索前列醇提供的胃黏膜保护程度明显大于西咪替丁。由于米索前列醇组胃液中生长抑素与西咪替丁组无显著差异,因此得出结论,胃液中生长抑素并非米索前列醇细胞保护能力的唯一原因。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验