• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫持续状态后成人的社会经济结局与生活质量:来自德国的一项多中心、纵向、匹配病例对照分析

Socioeconomic Outcome and Quality of Life in Adults after Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter, Longitudinal, Matched Case-Control Analysis from Germany.

作者信息

Kortland Lena-Marie, Knake Susanne, von Podewils Felix, Rosenow Felix, Strzelczyk Adam

机构信息

Epilepsy Center Hessen, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.

Epilepsy Center Greifswald, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 26;8:507. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00507. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2017.00507
PMID:29018404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5622933/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data concerning socioeconomic outcome and quality of life (QoL) in patients after status epilepticus (SE) in Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients treated between 2011 and 2015 due to SE at the university hospitals in Frankfurt, Greifswald, and Marburg were asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding long-term outcome of at least 3 months after discharge. The SE cohort consisted of 25.9% patients with an acute symptomatic, 42% with a remote symptomatic and previous epilepsy, 22.2% with a new-onset remote symptomatic, and 9.9% with other or unknown etiology. A matched case-control analysis was applied for comparison with patients with drug refractory epilepsy and seizure remission, both not previously affected by SE.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients (mean age: 58.7 ± 18.0 years; 58% female) participated. A non-refractory course was present in 59.3%, while 27.2% had a refractory SE (RSE) and 13.6% had a superrefractory SE (SRSE). Before admission, a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-3 was found in 82.7% (67/81), deteriorating to 38.3% (31/81) ( = 0.003) at discharge. The majority returned home [51.9% (42/81)], 32.1% entered a rehabilitation facility, while 12.3% were transferred to a nursing home and 3.7% to another hospital. The overall mRS at follow-up did not change; 61.8% (45/74) reached an mRS of 0-3. In RSE and SRSE, the proportion with a favorable mRS increased from 45.5% at discharge to 70% at follow-up, while QoL was comparable to a non-refractory SE course. Matched epilepsy controls in seizure remission were treated with a lower mean number of anticonvulsants (1.3 ± 0.7) compared to controls with drug refractory epilepsy (1.9 ± 0.8;  < 0.001) or SE (1.9 ± 1.1;  < 0.001). A major depression was found in 32.8% of patients with SE and in 36.8% of drug refractory epilepsy, but only in 20.3% of patients in seizure remission. QoL was reduced in all categories (QOLIE-31) in SE patients in comparison with patients in seizure remission, but was comparable to patients with drug refractory epilepsy.

DISCUSSION

Patients after SE show substantial impairments in their QoL and daily life activities. However, in the long term, patients with RSE and SRSE had a relatively favorable outcome comparable to that of patients with a non-refractory SE course. This underlines the need for efficient therapeutic options in SE.

摘要

背景

在德国,关于癫痫持续状态(SE)患者的社会经济结局和生活质量(QoL)的数据匮乏。

患者与方法

2011年至2015年间在法兰克福、格赖夫斯瓦尔德和马尔堡的大学医院因SE接受治疗的成年患者被要求填写一份关于出院后至少3个月长期结局的问卷。SE队列包括25.9%的急性症状性患者、42%的既往有症状性和癫痫病史的患者、22.2%的新发远程症状性患者以及9.9%病因不明或其他病因的患者。采用匹配病例对照分析与药物难治性癫痫和癫痫发作缓解患者进行比较,这两组患者既往均未受SE影响。

结果

共有81例患者(平均年龄:58.7±18.0岁;58%为女性)参与。59.3%为非难治性病程,27.2%为难治性SE(RSE),13.6%为超难治性SE(SRSE)。入院前,82.7%(67/81)的患者改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0 - 3,出院时降至38.3%(31/81)(P = 0.003)。大多数患者回家[51.9%(42/81)],32.1%进入康复机构,12.3%被转至养老院,3.7%转至其他医院。随访时总体mRS未改变;61.8%(45/74)的患者mRS评分为0 - 3。在RSE和SRSE患者中,mRS评分良好的比例从出院时的45.5%增至随访时的70%,而生活质量与非难治性SE病程相当。癫痫发作缓解的匹配癫痫对照组平均使用的抗惊厥药物数量(1.3±0.7)低于药物难治性癫痫对照组(1.9±0.8;P < 0.001)或SE对照组(1.9±1.1;P < 0.001)。32.8%的SE患者和36.8%的药物难治性癫痫患者存在重度抑郁,但癫痫发作缓解的患者中只有20.3%有重度抑郁。与癫痫发作缓解的患者相比,SE患者在所有类别(QOLIE - 31)中的生活质量均降低,但与药物难治性癫痫患者相当。

讨论

SE患者的生活质量和日常生活活动存在严重损害。然而,从长期来看,RSE和SRSE患者的结局相对较好,与非难治性SE病程的患者相当。这突出了SE有效治疗方案的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/5622933/5536acc1a0b8/fneur-08-00507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/5622933/c2aa422977f6/fneur-08-00507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/5622933/5536acc1a0b8/fneur-08-00507-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/5622933/c2aa422977f6/fneur-08-00507-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b3e/5622933/5536acc1a0b8/fneur-08-00507-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Outcome and Quality of Life in Adults after Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter, Longitudinal, Matched Case-Control Analysis from Germany.癫痫持续状态后成人的社会经济结局与生活质量:来自德国的一项多中心、纵向、匹配病例对照分析
Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 26;8:507. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00507. eCollection 2017.
2
Long-term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: A retrospective population-based study.成人难治性癫痫持续状态的长期预后:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Jul;133:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
3
Outcome of emergency neurosurgery in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态患者的急诊神经外科手术结果:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2024 May 28;15:1403266. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1403266. eCollection 2024.
4
Costs and cost-driving factors for acute treatment of adults with status epilepticus: A multicenter cohort study from Germany.成人癫痫持续状态急性治疗的成本及成本驱动因素:一项来自德国的多中心队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2016 Dec;57(12):2056-2066. doi: 10.1111/epi.13584. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
Factors associated with occurrence and outcome of super-refractory status epilepticus.与超难治性癫痫持续状态发生和结局相关的因素。
Seizure. 2017 Nov;52:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
6
Specific characteristics and current diagnostic and treatment modalities performance of super refractory status epilepticus in children: A comparative study.儿童难治性癫痫持续状态的特定特征及目前的诊断和治疗方式效果:一项对比研究。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2022 Mar;37:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
7
Burden and epidemiology of status epilepticus in infants, children, and adolescents: A population-based study on German health insurance data.婴儿、儿童和青少年癫痫持续状态的负担和流行病学:基于德国健康保险数据的一项人群研究。
Epilepsia. 2019 May;60(5):911-920. doi: 10.1111/epi.14729. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
8
Efficacy and safety of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: cohort study of 81 patients and literature review.在难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态中使用吡仑帕奈的疗效和安全性:81 例患者的队列研究和文献复习。
J Neurol. 2021 Oct;268(10):3744-3757. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10506-9. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
Costs and cost-driving factors of acute treatment of status epilepticus in children and adolescents: A cohort study from Germany.儿童和青少年癫痫持续状态急性治疗的成本及成本驱动因素:一项来自德国的队列研究。
Seizure. 2022 Apr;97:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
10
New onset status epilepticus and its long-term outcome: A cohort study.新发病态性癫痫发作及其长期转归:一项队列研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Oct;206:107442. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107442. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities for and Challenges of Pulmonary Drug Delivery in the Management of Acute Exacerbations of CNS Disorders.中枢神经系统疾病急性加重期肺部给药的机遇与挑战
CNS Drugs. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01213-4.
2
New onset refractory status epilepticus: Long-term outcomes beyond seizures.新发难治性癫痫持续状态:癫痫发作之外的长期预后
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):988-1005. doi: 10.1111/epi.18267. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
3
Status epilepticus in patients with brain tumors and metastases: A multicenter cohort study of 208 patients and literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Costs, length of stay, and mortality of super-refractory status epilepticus: A population-based study from Germany.超难治性癫痫持续状态的成本、住院时间和死亡率:来自德国的一项基于人群的研究。
Epilepsia. 2017 Sep;58(9):1533-1541. doi: 10.1111/epi.13837. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
2
Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.国际抗癫痫联盟对癫痫发作类型的操作性分类:国际抗癫痫联盟分类和术语委员会立场文件
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):522-530. doi: 10.1111/epi.13670. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Costs and cost-driving factors for acute treatment of adults with status epilepticus: A multicenter cohort study from Germany.
脑肿瘤和转移瘤患者的癫痫持续状态:一项对208例患者的多中心队列研究及文献综述
Neurol Res Pract. 2024 Apr 4;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s42466-024-00314-7.
4
Is prophylactic anti-convulsive treatment necessary in subdural hematomas?硬膜下血肿是否需要预防性抗惊厥治疗?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Aug;29(8):883-889. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.06554.
5
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes.癫痫持续状态复发患者的临床特征及预后
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 Jul 13;5(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00261-9.
6
Clinician-Reported Physical and Cognitive Impairments After Convulsive Status Epilepticus: Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.惊厥性癫痫持续状态后临床报告的躯体和认知障碍:一项随机对照试验的事后研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Apr;40(2):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01758-6. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
7
Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients Hospitalized With Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in the United States.美国全身性惊厥性癫痫持续状态住院患者住院时间延长的相关因素。
Neurohospitalist. 2021 Oct;11(4):310-316. doi: 10.1177/19418744211000534. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
8
Isoflurane in (Super-) Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter Evaluation.七氟醚治疗(超)难治性癫痫持续状态的多中心评估。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):631-639. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01250-z. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
9
[S2k guidelines: status epilepticus in adulthood : Guidelines of the German Society for Neurology].[S2k指南:成人癫痫持续状态:德国神经病学学会指南]
Nervenarzt. 2021 Oct;92(10):1002-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-01036-2. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
DIagnostic Subdural EEG electrodes And Subdural hEmatoma (DISEASE): a study protocol for a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.诊断性硬膜下脑电图电极与硬膜下血肿(疾病):一项前瞻性非随机对照试验的研究方案
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Dec 15;2:50. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00096-8. eCollection 2020.
成人癫痫持续状态急性治疗的成本及成本驱动因素:一项来自德国的多中心队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2016 Dec;57(12):2056-2066. doi: 10.1111/epi.13584. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Neurologist adherence to clinical practice guidelines and costs in patients with newly diagnosed and chronic epilepsy in Germany.德国新诊断和慢性癫痫患者中神经科医生对临床实践指南的遵循情况及费用
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.07.037. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
5
A definition and classification of status epilepticus--Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的定义和分类——国际抗癫痫联盟癫痫持续状态分类特别工作组的报告。
Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1515-23. doi: 10.1111/epi.13121. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
Preliminary results of the global audit of treatment of refractory status epilepticus.难治性癫痫持续状态治疗的全球审计初步结果。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Functional outcome of prolonged refractory status epilepticus.长时间难治性癫痫持续状态的功能转归
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 30;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0914-9.
8
Status epilepticus in adults.成人癫痫持续状态。
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jun;14(6):615-24. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00042-3. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Evaluation of costs of epilepsy using an electronic practice management software in Germany.在德国使用电子实践管理软件对癫痫治疗成本进行评估。
Seizure. 2015 Mar;26:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Cost of status epilepticus: A systematic review.癫痫持续状态的成本:一项系统综述。
Seizure. 2015 Jan;24:17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 15.