• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状性颈动脉手术试验-2(ACST-2):一项正在进行的随机对照试验,比较颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中。

The Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): an ongoing randomised controlled trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke.

机构信息

Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(57):1-40. doi: 10.3310/hta21570.

DOI:10.3310/hta21570
PMID:29019319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A successful open surgical operation to remove atheromatous carotid artery narrowing that has not yet caused a stroke (asymptomatic carotid stenosis) carries some procedural risk but, if completed successfully, halves patients' future annual stroke risk for at least 10 years. A newer, less invasive alternative is carotid stenting, which also carries some procedural risk, especially if the carotid lesion has recently given rise to a stroke (symptomatic carotid stenosis). For both surgery and stenting, improvements in technique (and in medication) have reduced risk. Early studies showed that treating carotid narrowing by stenting, particularly for symptomatic lesions, caused more procedural minor strokes than surgery, but more recent trials in symptomatic and in asymptomatic patients found that both procedures might now be equally safe and effective. However, low patient numbers, short follow-up of the long-term effects on stroke rates and wide confidence intervals mean that worldwide uncertainty persists between carotid surgery and carotid stenting, and national and international guidelines remain unclear as to which is generally better.

OBJECTIVES

The second Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-2) compares carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with carotid artery stenting (CAS) directly, randomising patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis for whom a carotid procedure is considered definitely necessary; both procedures seem anatomically feasible, and there is substantial uncertainty as to which of the two would be better for such individuals. Although it will compare procedural risks, the trial's primary aim is to compare the long-term durability of protection against strokes occurring in the years post procedure due to any remaining or recurrent carotid disease.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial comparing CEA with CAS.

SETTING

Hospitals in the UK and worldwide, in which carotid procedures are common.

PARTICIPANTS

Men and women with severely stenotic atherosclerotic carotid artery disease, with or without previous stroke but with no recent symptoms from the randomised artery.

INTERVENTIONS

CEA and CAS.

OUTCOMES

(1) Periprocedural risk defined as myocardial infarction, stroke or death within 30 days after the randomised procedure and (2) long-term rates of disabling or fatal stroke during follow-up of patients.

MEASUREMENT OF COSTS AND OUTCOMES

Measurement of intervention costs and stroke costs (periprocedural and during follow-up) and of quality of life [EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)] for patients in the top six recruiting countries (UK, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Serbia and Sweden), who currently constitute 85% of those randomised.

PROGRESS SO FAR

By the end of March 2016, ACST-2 had included 2125 patients, nearly two-thirds of the planned recruitment of 3600; 1061 were randomly allocated to CEA and 1064 to CAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Further funding has been secured and recruitment continues, with completion anticipated by the end of 2019. ACST-2 will report initial results in 2021.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN21144362.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 21, No. 57. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding was also received from BUPA Foundation [BUPAF/33(a)/05].

摘要

背景

对于尚未导致中风的动脉粥样硬化颈动脉狭窄(无症状性颈动脉狭窄)进行成功的开放式手术切除会带来一些手术风险,但如果手术成功,患者未来 10 年内每年中风的风险将减半。一种更新、侵入性较小的替代方法是颈动脉支架置入术,它也有一些手术风险,尤其是当颈动脉病变最近导致中风(症状性颈动脉狭窄)时。对于手术和支架置入术,技术(和药物治疗)的改进降低了风险。早期研究表明,通过支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄,特别是对于症状性病变,比手术导致更多的手术性轻度中风,但最近在症状性和无症状性患者中的试验发现,这两种手术现在可能同样安全有效。然而,患者数量较少,对中风发生率的长期影响的随访时间短,以及置信区间较宽,这意味着全球范围内在颈动脉手术和颈动脉支架置入术之间仍然存在不确定性,国家和国际指南仍然不清楚哪种方法总体上更好。

目的

第二次无症状性颈动脉手术试验(ACST-2)直接比较颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS),随机分配有症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者,这些患者认为颈动脉手术是绝对必要的;两种手术似乎在解剖学上都是可行的,对于这种情况,哪种手术方法更好存在很大的不确定性。尽管它将比较手术风险,但试验的主要目的是比较由于任何残留或复发的颈动脉疾病而导致的术后多年内发生中风的长期保护效果的持久性。

设计

随机对照试验比较 CEA 和 CAS。

地点

英国和全球范围内经常进行颈动脉手术的医院。

参与者

患有严重狭窄性动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉疾病的男性和女性,有或没有先前的中风,但随机动脉没有近期症状。

干预措施

CEA 和 CAS。

结果

(1)围手术期风险定义为随机手术后 30 天内发生心肌梗死、中风或死亡,以及(2)在患者随访期间发生致残性或致死性中风的长期风险。

测量成本和结果

测量干预成本和中风成本(围手术期和随访期间)以及六个主要招募国家(英国、意大利、比利时、德国、塞尔维亚和瑞典)的患者的生活质量[EuroQol-5 维度(EQ-5D)],目前这些国家占随机分配患者的 85%。

进展情况

截至 2016 年 3 月底,ACST-2 已纳入 2125 名患者,接近计划招募的 3600 名患者的三分之二;1061 名患者被随机分配至 CEA 组,1064 名患者被随机分配至 CAS 组。

结论

进一步获得了资金,并继续招募患者,预计将于 2019 年底完成。ACST-2 将在 2021 年报告初步结果。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN87273668。

资金

本项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)卫生技术评估计划资助,将在 中全文发表;第 21 卷,第 57 期。请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站以获取更多项目信息。该项目还得到了 BUPA 基金会[BUPAF/33(a)/05]的资助。

相似文献

1
The Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): an ongoing randomised controlled trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke.无症状性颈动脉手术试验-2(ACST-2):一项正在进行的随机对照试验,比较颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(57):1-40. doi: 10.3310/hta21570.
2
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
3
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
4
Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): rationale for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.无症状颈动脉手术试验-2(ACST-2):一项比较无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的随机临床试验的原理
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Aug;38(2):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
5
Status update and interim results from the asymptomatic carotid surgery trial-2 (ACST-2).无症状性颈动脉手术试验-2(ACST-2)的现状更新和中期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;46(5):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
Vertebral artery stenting to prevent recurrent stroke in symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: the VIST RCT.症状性椎动脉狭窄患者行椎动脉支架置入术预防卒中复发的 VIST RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(41):1-30. doi: 10.3310/hta23410.
7
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
8
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Long-term outcomes of stenting and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual patient data.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术和内膜切除术的长期结果:一项个体化患者数据的预先计划的合并分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30028-6. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
10
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的药物干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;8(8):CD013573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013573.pub2.
2
Increased Regional Market Competition is Associated with a Lower Threshold for Revascularization in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.区域市场竞争加剧与无症状性颈动脉狭窄血管再通治疗阈值降低相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:164-173. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
3
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Several Guidelines with Unclear Answers.无症状性颈动脉狭窄:多项指南但答案不明。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Mar-Apr;25(2):171-176. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_566_21. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
The quick carotid scan for prevention of strokes due to carotid artery disease.用于预防因颈动脉疾病导致中风的快速颈动脉扫描。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1202. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7687.
5
Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的管理可能需要个体化:多学科行动呼吁。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.04273. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Contemporary Trends in Physician Utilization Rates of CEA and CAS for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis among Medicare Beneficiaries.当代 Medicare 受益人群无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行 CEA 和 CAS 治疗的医师使用率趋势。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;71:132-144. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.118. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
7
Factors influencing credentialing of interventionists in the CREST-2 trial.影响 CREST-2 试验介入治疗师认证的因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jul 26.