大鼠微血管吻合术中连续缝合技术与间断缝合技术的比较
Continuous versus interrupted suture technique in microvascular anastomosis in rats.
作者信息
Barros Rui Sergio Monteiro de, Leal Rafael Aquino, Teixeira Renan Kleber Costa, Yamaki Vitor Nagai, Feijó Daniel Haber, Gouveia Eduardo Henrique Herbster, Valente André Lopes, Silva Denilson José, Carvalho Luan Teles Ferreira de
机构信息
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Experimental Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA), Belem-PA, Brazil. Conception, design, intellectual and scientific content of the study, critical revision.
MD, Department of Experimental Surgery, School of Medicine, UEPA, Belem-PA, Brazil. Conception, design, intellectual and scientific content of the study; interpretation of data; manuscript writing.
出版信息
Acta Cir Bras. 2017 Sep;32(9):691-696. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020170090000001.
PURPOSE
To compare the continuous and interrupted suture technique on femoral artery on rats after vessel repair and 14 days after.
METHODS
Twenty rats were operated randomly divided into two group matched according to the suture technique used: interrupted or continuous. We performed a femoral anastomosis on the right femoral artery. We analyzed weight, arterial caliber, anastomosis time and patency after vessel repair and 14 days after.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference between groups in the weight (p=0.64), diameter of the femoral artery (p=0.95) and patency (p=1.00). The time spent in the anastomosis was 451 seconds in the continuous group and 718 seconds in the interrupted group, presenting significant difference (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The continuous suture technique shows a similar patency rates than interrupted technique, however with a shorter time to perform the anastomosis.
目的
比较血管修复后及术后14天大鼠股动脉连续缝合技术与间断缝合技术的效果。
方法
将20只接受手术的大鼠根据所采用的缝合技术（间断或连续）随机分为两组并进行匹配。我们在右侧股动脉上进行了股动脉吻合术。我们分析了血管修复后及术后14天的体重、动脉管径、吻合时间和通畅情况。
结果
两组在体重（p = 0.64）、股动脉直径（p = 0.95）和通畅情况（p = 1.00）方面无显著差异。连续缝合组的吻合时间为451秒，间断缝合组为718秒，差异有统计学意义（p < 0.01）。
结论
连续缝合技术与间断缝合技术的通畅率相似，但吻合时间更短。
Zotero 插件