Oates Gabriela R, Hamby Bryant W, Stepanikova Irena, Knight Sara J, Bhatt Surya P, Hitchcock Jason, Schumann Christopher, Dransfield Mark T
a Preventive Medicine , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA.
b Sociology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , AL , USA.
COPD. 2017 Dec;14(6):610-617. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1379070. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is low. Previous studies have focused on clinical predictors of PR completion. We aimed to identify social determinants of adherence to PR. A cross-sectional analysis of a database of COPD patients (N = 455) in an outpatient PR program was performed. Adherence, a ratio of attended-to-prescribed sessions, was coded as low (<35%), moderate (35-85%), and high (>85%). Individual-level measures included age, sex, race, BMI, smoking status, pack-years, baseline 6-minute walk distance (6MWD: <150, 150-249, ≥250), co-morbidities, depression, and prescribed PR sessions (≤20, 21-30, >30). Fifteen area-level measures aggregated to Census tracts were obtained from the U.S. Census after geocoding patients' addresses. Using exploratory factor analysis, a neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage index was constructed, which included variables with factor loading >0.5: poverty, public assistance, households without vehicles, cost burden, unemployment, and minority population. Multivariate regression models were adjusted for clustering on Census tracts. Twenty-six percent of patients had low adherence, 23% were moderately adherent, 51% were highly adherent. In the best fitted full model, each decile increase in neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage increased the risk of moderate vs high adherence by 14% (p < 0.01). Smoking tripled the relative risk of low adherence (p < 0.01), while each increase in 6MWD category decreased that risk by 72% (p < 0.01) and 84% (p < 0.001), respectively. These findings show that, relative to high adherence, low adherence is associated with limited functional capacity and current smoking, while moderate adherence is associated with socioeconomic disadvantage. The distinction highlights different pathways to suboptimal adherence and calls for tailored intervention approaches.
肺康复(PR)的依从性较低。以往的研究主要关注PR完成情况的临床预测因素。我们旨在确定PR依从性的社会决定因素。对一个门诊PR项目中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者数据库(N = 455)进行了横断面分析。依从性以参加疗程与规定疗程的比例来衡量,分为低依从性(<35%)、中等依从性(35 - 85%)和高依从性(>85%)。个体层面的测量指标包括年龄、性别、种族、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟状况、吸烟包年数、基线6分钟步行距离(6MWD:<150、150 - 249、≥250)、合并症、抑郁以及规定的PR疗程(≤20、21 - 30、>30)。在对患者地址进行地理编码后,从美国人口普查中获取了15个汇总到普查区的区域层面测量指标。使用探索性因素分析构建了一个邻里社会经济劣势指数,该指数包括因子载荷>0.5的变量:贫困、公共援助、无车辆家庭、成本负担、失业和少数族裔人口。多变量回归模型针对普查区的聚类情况进行了调整。26%的患者依从性低,23%为中等依从性,51%为高依从性。在拟合效果最佳的完整模型中,邻里社会经济劣势每增加一个十分位数,中等依从性与高依从性相比的风险增加14%(p < 0.01)。吸烟使低依从性的相对风险增加两倍(p < 0.01),而6MWD类别每增加一级,该风险分别降低72%(p < 0.01)和84%(p < 0.001)。这些发现表明,相对于高依从性,低依从性与功能能力受限和当前吸烟有关,而中等依从性与社会经济劣势有关。这种差异凸显了次优依从性的不同途径,并呼吁采取针对性的干预方法。