Vianna A G D, Sanches C P, Barreto F C
Curitiba Diabetes Center, Division of Endocrinology, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Rua Alcides Munhoz, 433-4° andar-Mercês, Curitiba, Paraná 80810-040 Brazil.
Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155-Bloco Medicina-Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná 80215-901 Brazil.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017 Sep 25;9:75. doi: 10.1186/s13098-017-0274-5. eCollection 2017.
Diabetes complications and osteoporotic fractures are two of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in older patients, and they share many features, including genetic susceptibility, molecular mechanisms, and environmental factors. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compromises bone microarchitecture by inducing abnormal bone cell function and matrix structure with increased osteoblast apoptosis, diminished osteoblast differentiation, and enhanced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The linkage between these two chronic diseases creates a possibility that certain antidiabetic therapies may affect bone function. The treatment of T2DM has been improved in the past two decades with the development of new therapeutic drugs. Each class has a pathophysiologic target related to the regulation of the energy metabolism and insulin secretion. However, both glycemic homeostasis and bone homeostasis are under the control of common regulatory factors. This background allows the individual pharmacological targets of antidiabetic therapies to affect bone quality due to their indirect effects on bone cell differentiation and the bone remodeling process. With a greater number of diabetic patients and antidiabetic agents being launched, it is critical to highlight the consequences of this disease and its pharmacological agents on bone health and fracture risk. Currently, there is little scientific knowledge approaching the impact of most anti-diabetic treatments on bone quality and fracture risk. Thus, this review aims to explore the pros and cons of the available pharmacologic treatments for T2DM on bone mineral density and risk fractures in humans.
糖尿病并发症和骨质疏松性骨折是老年患者发病和死亡的两个最重要原因,它们有许多共同特征,包括遗传易感性、分子机制和环境因素。2型糖尿病(T2DM)通过诱导异常的骨细胞功能和基质结构,增加成骨细胞凋亡、减少成骨细胞分化以及增强破骨细胞介导的骨吸收,从而损害骨微结构。这两种慢性疾病之间的联系使得某些抗糖尿病疗法可能影响骨功能成为一种可能。在过去二十年中,随着新治疗药物的开发,T2DM的治疗得到了改善。每一类药物都有一个与能量代谢调节和胰岛素分泌相关的病理生理靶点。然而,血糖稳态和骨稳态都受共同调节因子的控制。这种背景使得抗糖尿病疗法的各个药理靶点因其对骨细胞分化和骨重塑过程的间接影响而影响骨质量。随着糖尿病患者数量的增加和抗糖尿病药物的推出,突出这种疾病及其药物对骨健康和骨折风险的影响至关重要。目前,关于大多数抗糖尿病治疗对骨质量和骨折风险的影响,几乎没有科学知识。因此,本综述旨在探讨现有T2DM药物治疗对人体骨密度和骨折风险的利弊。