Surgery performed by supervised registrars does not adversely affect medium-term functional outcomes after total knee replacement.

Introduction Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an index procedure for orthopaedic registrars, there is a lack of published research as to the effects of surgery when performed by supervised trainees. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes up to five years after primary TKA performed by consultants and trainee surgeons. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data for 609 consecutive patients (339 female, 270 male) undergoing TKA. Patients were assessed preoperatively as well as at 18 months, three years and five years postoperatively, and American Knee Society objective knee and functional scores (AKSK and AKSF) were recorded. Results Surgery was performed by a consultant in 465 cases and a supervised trainee in 144 cases. There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative patient characteristics, operative time (p=0.15), transfusion rates (p=0.84), length of stay (p=0.98), manipulation under anaesthesia (p=0.69), or mortality rates at one year (p=0.73) or five years (p=0.81). Postoperatively, the median magnitude of improvement in AKSK (48 points for consultant group vs 45 points for trainee group, p=0.74) and in AKSF (both groups 15, p=0.995) was similar between the groups. AKSK and AKSF scores were similar at all timepoints up to five years following surgery, and there was no difference in the median range of motion (both groups 100°, IQR: 18°) at five years (p=0.43). Conclusions TKA performed by supervised registrars gives functional outcomes that are equivalent to consultant performed TKA, without affecting postoperative range of movement, or increasing operative time, length of stay or transfusion rates. Rates of postoperative MUA and mortality are also comparable.