Hartley Christopher P, Mahajan Aparna M, Selvaggi Suzanne M, Rehrauer William M
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Nov;125(11):838-847. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21935. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
The current study was conducted to compare DNA yield, including normalization to nuclear area, DNA amplification functionality, and detection of KRAS mutations between matched fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens and pancreatic resections diagnostic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
A retrospective sample of 30 matched single FNA smears and macrodissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) curls (2 5-μm curls) were compared by measuring the following: nuclear area (via digital image analysis), DNA yield (via NanoDrop spectrophotometry and Quantus fluorometry), and polymerase chain reaction threshold cycles for KRAS amplifications. Variants in KRAS codons 12/13 and 61 were detected by fluorescent melt curve analyses, followed by Sanger DNA sequencing.
Despite a similar nuclear area, FNA smears yielded greater DNA per nuclear area via 2 DNA quantification methods. KRAS codon 12 mutations were detected in 23 of 30 FNA specimens (77%) compared with 17 of 30 matched FFPE specimens (57%), for a concordance rate of 74%. No KRAS codon 13 or 61 mutations were detected.
FNA specimens are a more optimal source of DNA, and represent an important resource in the preresection and postresection molecular analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:838-47. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
本研究旨在比较配对的细针穿刺(FNA)标本与诊断为胰腺导管腺癌的胰腺切除术标本之间的DNA产量(包括按核面积标准化)、DNA扩增功能以及KRAS突变检测情况。
对30对配对的单个FNA涂片和大切片福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)卷(2个5μm卷)进行回顾性抽样比较,测量以下指标:核面积(通过数字图像分析)、DNA产量(通过NanoDrop分光光度法和Quantus荧光法)以及KRAS扩增的聚合酶链反应阈值循环数。通过荧光熔解曲线分析检测KRAS密码子12/13和61的变异,随后进行桑格DNA测序。
尽管核面积相似,但通过两种DNA定量方法,FNA涂片每核面积产生的DNA更多。30个FNA标本中有23个(77%)检测到KRAS密码子12突变,而30个配对的FFPE标本中有17个(57%)检测到,一致率为74%。未检测到KRAS密码子13或61突变。
FNA标本是更理想的DNA来源,是胰腺导管腺癌术前和术后分子分析的重要资源。《癌症细胞病理学》2017年;125:838 - 47。©2017美国癌症协会。