Center for Motion Analysis, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Elite Sports Medicine, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):52-57. doi: 10.1177/0363546517733471. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
The incidence of upper extremity injury in baseball pitchers has increased over the past decade. This has resulted in a large body of research mainly focused on the kinematic and kinetic patterns of the elbow and shoulder to elucidate the cause of these injuries, with little attention on studying the associations of forearm rotation and upper arm joint moments.
There will be significant differences in forearm kinematics and kinetics when comparing the fastball pitch with the curveball pitch. There will be a positive association between forearm kinetics, specifically supination and pronation moments, and the elbow varus moment.
Descriptive laboratory study.
A total of 78 pitchers were recruited for this study, and they underwent a pitching analysis using motion analysis techniques. A random-intercept, mixed-effects regression model was used to determine differences in forearm kinematics and kinetics when pitching a fastball compared with a curveball, as well as to determine if associations existed between forearm supination and pronation moments and the elbow varus moment.
There were a number of significant differences in forearm position when pitching a fastball compared with a curveball, with the curveball producing a more supinated forearm position. Significant associations were found between increasing forearm supination moments and an increase in elbow varus moment for both the fastball and the curveball ( P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). For every 1-N·m increase in the supination moment, there was a 1-N·m and 1.1-N·m increase in the elbow varus moment for the fastball and curveball, respectively.
The results demonstrated that the forearm position was not associated with the elbow varus moment. However, the supination moment was associated with the elbow varus moment.
On the basis of these findings, pitching coaches and trainers can understand the implications of proper lower arm pitching mechanics in the later portion of the pitch cycle as a potential risk of injury and, therefore, can develop coaching strategies to reduce incorrect positioning, especially when players are pitching the curveball.
在过去的十年中,棒球投手中上肢损伤的发生率有所增加。这导致了大量的研究主要集中在肘部和肩部的运动学和动力学模式上,以阐明这些损伤的原因,但很少关注研究前臂旋转和上臂关节力矩的相关性。
在比较快球投球和曲线球投球时,前臂运动学和动力学会有显著差异。前臂动力学,特别是旋前和旋后力矩,与肘内翻力矩之间存在正相关。
描述性实验室研究。
共有 78 名投手参加了这项研究,他们使用运动分析技术进行了投球分析。使用随机截距混合效应回归模型来确定投快速球与投曲线球时前臂运动学和动力学的差异,以及确定前臂旋前和旋后力矩与肘内翻力矩之间是否存在关联。
与投曲线球相比,投快速球时前臂位置有许多显著差异,曲线球使前臂处于更旋前的位置。对于快速球和曲线球,都发现前臂旋前力矩增加与肘内翻力矩增加之间存在显著相关性(P =.002 和 P <.001)。对于每增加 1-N·m 的旋前力矩,快速球和曲线球的肘内翻力矩分别增加 1-N·m 和 1.1-N·m。
结果表明,前臂位置与肘内翻力矩无关。然而,旋前力矩与肘内翻力矩有关。
基于这些发现,投球教练和训练师可以了解正确的下臂投球力学在投球周期后期对受伤风险的影响,因此可以制定教练策略来减少不正确的姿势,尤其是在球员投曲线球时。