• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单干预措施可减少心血管和外科/创伤 ICU 中的便携式胸部 X 光片(pCXR)检查及其相关结果。

Single intervention for a reduction in portable chest radiography (pCXR) in cardiovascular and surgical/trauma ICUs and associated outcomes.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.003
PMID:29024879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5831480/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Studies suggest that "on-demand" radiography is equivalent to daily routine with regard to adverse events. In these studies, provider behavior is controlled. Pragmatic implementation has not been studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study. Medical directors of two intervention ICUs requested pCXRs be ordered on an on-demand basis at one time point, without controlling or monitoring behavior or providing follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 11,994 patient days over 18months were included. Combined characteristics: Age: 56.7, 66% male, 96% survival, APACHE II 14 (IQR: 11-19), mechanical ventilation (MV) (occurrences)/patient admission: mean 0.7 (SD: 0.6; range: 0-5), duration (hours) of MV: 21.7 (IQR: 9.8-81.4) and ICU LOS (days): 2.8 (IQR: 1.8-5.6). Average pCXR rate/patient/day before was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96), and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77) after. Controlling for severity, daily pCXR rate decreased by 21.7% (p<0.001), then increased by about 3%/month (p=0.044). There was no change in APACHE II, mortality, and occurrences or duration of MV, unplanned re-intubations, ICU LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill adults, pCXR reduction can be achieved in cardiothoracic and trauma/surgical patients with a pragmatic intervention, without adversely affecting patient care, outside a controlled study.

摘要

目的

研究表明,“按需”放射学在不良事件方面与日常例行检查相当。在这些研究中,医生的行为受到了控制。但尚未对实用的执行情况进行研究。

材料和方法

这是一项准实验性、干预前后研究。在一个时间点,两个干预性重症监护病房(ICU)的医疗主任要求按需进行床边 X 线摄影,而不控制或监测行为或提供后续服务。

结果

共纳入 18 个月内的 11994 个患者日。综合特征:年龄:56.7 岁,66%为男性,96%存活,急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II(APACHE II)为 14 分(四分位距:11-19),机械通气(MV)(发生次数)/患者入院:平均值为 0.7(标准差:0.6;范围:0-5),MV 持续时间(小时):21.7(四分位距:9.8-81.4)和 ICU 住院时间(天):2.8(四分位距:1.8-5.6)。之前,患者每天的床边 X 线摄影率为 0.93(95%可信区间:0.89-0.96),之后为 0.73(95%可信区间:0.69-0.77)。在控制严重程度后,每天床边 X 线摄影率下降了 21.7%(p<0.001),然后每月增加约 3%(p=0.044)。APACHE II 评分、死亡率以及 MV、计划性再插管、ICU 住院时间的发生次数或持续时间均无变化。

结论

在重症成人患者中,在不进行控制研究的情况下,通过实用的干预措施,可在心胸和创伤/外科患者中实现床边 X 线摄影的减少,而不会对患者护理产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Single intervention for a reduction in portable chest radiography (pCXR) in cardiovascular and surgical/trauma ICUs and associated outcomes.单干预措施可减少心血管和外科/创伤 ICU 中的便携式胸部 X 光片(pCXR)检查及其相关结果。
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Impact of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system on the outcome of critically ill adult patients: a before-after study.计算机化医师医嘱录入系统(CPOE)对成年危重症患者结局的影响:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Nov 19;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-71.
3
"One-way-street" streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay.“单行道”式优化流程对危重症创伤患者的收治可缩短急诊科停留时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):1019-1024. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
4
Prevalence of obesity and the effect on length of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in intensive care patients: A single site observational study.肥胖症的患病率及其对重症监护患者机械通气时长和住院时长的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2017 May;30(3):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Semi-quantitative visual assessment of chest radiography is associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.半定量胸部 X 线摄影评估与危重症患者的临床结局相关。
Respir Res. 2019 Oct 12;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1201-0.
6
Test-ordering strategy in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的检验医嘱策略。
J Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):330-9. doi: 10.1177/0885066603256344.
7
Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit.谵妄作为重症监护病房机械通气患者死亡率的预测指标。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1753-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1753.
8
A "Code ICU" expedited review of critically ill patients is associated with reduced emergency department length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.对危重症患者进行“代码 ICU”快速审查与降低急诊科住院时间和机械通气时间有关。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
What's in a day? Determining intensive care unit length of stay.一天里包含了什么?确定重症监护病房的住院时长。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):2090-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00071.
10
The effect of positive balance on the outcomes of critically ill noncardiac postsurgical patients: a retrospective cohort study.正平衡对非心脏手术后重症患者预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Are routine, daily chest radiographs (CXR) necessary following (VATS and RATS) lobectomies?在(电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助胸腔镜手术)肺叶切除术后,常规每日进行胸部X光检查(CXR)有必要吗?
Surg Open Sci. 2024 May 30;20:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.010. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Comparison of the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Efficacies of Portable Recruited Chest Radiography with Conventional Portable Radiography in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.便携式招募胸部X线摄影与传统便携式X线摄影对机械通气患者的诊断和治疗效果比较
Tanaffos. 2019 Apr;18(4):351-354.
3
Deimplementation of Routine Chest X-rays in Adult Intensive Care Units.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of limited chest x-ray technique in postcardiac surgery management.心脏手术后管理中有限胸部X线技术的评估
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Jan-Mar;20(1):38-41. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.197829.
2
Clinical relevance of the routine daily chest X-Ray in the surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房常规每日胸部X光检查的临床相关性。
Am J Surg. 2017 Jul;214(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.059. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
3
Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement.管理临床知识以改善医疗保健。
取消成人重症监护病房常规胸部 X 光检查。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Feb;14(2):83-89. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3129.
Yearb Med Inform. 2000(1):65-70.
4
The value of routine chest radiographs after minimally invasive cardiac surgery: an observational cohort study.微创心脏手术后常规胸部X光片的价值:一项观察性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Nov 11;9:174. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0174-9.
5
Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Routine Daily Chest Radiography in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Tracheostomy Tubes: A Retrospective Review.重症监护病房中带气管造口管患者常规每日胸部X线摄影的临床效用评估:一项回顾性研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;31(5):333-7. doi: 10.1177/0885066614538393. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
6
Are daily routine chest radiographs necessary after pulmonary surgery in adult patients?成年患者肺切除术后有必要进行每日常规胸部X光检查吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(6):995-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt352. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
7
Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重症监护病房中的常规胸部X光检查:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2012 Dec 12;16(2):R68. doi: 10.1186/cc11321.
8
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.答案是 17 年,问题是:理解转化研究中的时间滞后。
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180.
9
Comparison of routine and on-demand prescription of chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated adults: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, two-period crossover study.机械通气成年患者胸部X线片常规处方与按需处方的比较:一项多中心、整群随机、两阶段交叉研究
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1687-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61459-8. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
10
Are daily routine chest radiographs useful in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients? A randomized study.对于重症机械通气患者,日常胸部X光片有用吗?一项随机研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):264-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0919-1. Epub 2007 Nov 10.