• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SSRIs 初始药物不依从对就诊次数和病假的影响。

Impact of initial medication non-adherence to SSRIs on medical visits and sick leaves.

机构信息

Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain; School of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:282-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.057. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.057
PMID:29024901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initial medication non-adherence (IMNA) to antidepressants, which are commonly used to treat depression in primary care (PC), is around 6-12%. Although it is well known that post-initial non-adherence to antidepressants increases the cost of depression, the impact of IMNA on cost is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of IMNA to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) on medical visits and sick leave in patients with depression treated in PC in Catalonia (Spain).

METHODS

This was a four-year retrospective register-based study (2011-2014). All PC patients of working age who received a new SSRI prescription and had a diagnosis of depression were included (N = 79,642). Treatment initiation, number of visits and days on sick leave were gathered from the database. We assessed the impact of IMNA on costs with ordered logistic regressions.

RESULTS

The 3-year incidence of IMNA was 15%. Initially non-adherent patients made a lesser number of GP visits (OR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.79-0.84) but had more days on sick leave (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.20-1.31). There were no differences in the number of specialist visits (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 0.99-1.08).

LIMITATIONS

Differences between adherent and non-adherent patients could be explained by non-observed variables. GP recognition and documentation of depression might be inaccurate. Costs of unpaid work and use of hospital services were not considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Although IMNA decreases the use of medical PC services, it increases the number of days on sick leave. This could also indicate worse health status. These consequences are currently overlooked when considering post-initial medication non-adherence.

摘要

背景

在初级保健(PC)中,常用抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症,初始药物不依从(IMNA)率约为 6-12%。虽然众所周知,抗抑郁药初始治疗后不依从会增加抑郁症的成本,但 IMNA 对成本的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估 PC 中治疗抑郁症的患者对选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的 IMNA 对医疗就诊和病假的影响。

方法

这是一项为期四年的回顾性基于登记的研究(2011-2014 年)。纳入了所有接受新的 SSRI 处方且诊断为抑郁症的有工作能力的 PC 患者(N=79642)。从数据库中收集治疗起始、就诊次数和病假天数。我们使用有序逻辑回归评估 IMNA 对成本的影响。

结果

3 年的 IMNA 发生率为 15%。最初不依从的患者就诊次数较少(OR=0.82;95%CI=0.79-0.84),但病假天数较多(OR=1.25;95%CI=1.20-1.31)。专科就诊次数无差异(OR=1.04;95%CI=0.99-1.08)。

局限性

依从性和不依从性患者之间的差异可能是由未观察到的变量解释的。GP 对抑郁症的识别和记录可能不准确。未考虑无薪工作和使用医院服务的成本。

结论

尽管 IMNA 减少了 PC 医疗服务的使用,但增加了病假天数。这也可能表明健康状况更差。在考虑初始治疗后药物不依从时,这些后果目前被忽视。

相似文献

1
Impact of initial medication non-adherence to SSRIs on medical visits and sick leaves.SSRIs 初始药物不依从对就诊次数和病假的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:282-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.057. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
2
Impact of initial medication non-adherence on use of healthcare services and sick leave: a longitudinal study in a large primary care cohort in Spain.初始药物不依从对医疗服务和病假使用的影响:西班牙大型初级保健队列中的纵向研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Sep;67(662):e614-e622. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692129. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Effect of copayment policies on initial medication non-adherence according to income: a population-based study.按收入划分的共付政策对初始药物治疗不依从性的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):878-891. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007416. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Initial medication non-adherence: prevalence and predictive factors in a cohort of 1.6 million primary care patients.初始药物治疗不依从性:160万初级保健患者队列中的患病率及预测因素
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;83(6):1328-1340. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13215. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Postpartum Psychiatric Outcomes and Sick Leave After Discontinuing SSRI or SNRI in Pregnancy.产后精神结局和停止 SSRI 或 SNRIs 治疗后妊娠期间的病假
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438269. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38269.
6
Sociological influences on antidepressant prescribing.社会学因素对抗抑郁药物处方的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Mar;56(6):1335-44. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00132-6.
7
Combining mirtazapine with SSRIs or SNRIs for treatment-resistant depression: the MIR RCT.联合米氮平与 SSRIs 或 SNRIs 治疗难治性抑郁症:MIR RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(63):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta22630.
8
Assessing the comparative-effectiveness of antidepressants commonly prescribed for depression in the US Medicare population.评估美国医疗保险人群中常用于治疗抑郁症的抗抑郁药的相对疗效。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Dec;15(4):171-8.
9
Differences in medication adherence and healthcare resource utilization patterns: older versus newer antidepressant agents in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders.药物依从性和医疗资源利用模式的差异:老年与新型抗抑郁药在抑郁症和/或焦虑症患者中的应用
CNS Drugs. 2008;22(11):963-73. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822110-00005.
10
Adherence to and Persistence with Antidepressant Medication during Pregnancy: Does It Differ by the Class of Antidepressant Medication Prescribed?怀孕期间抗抑郁药物的依从性和持久性:这是否因处方抗抑郁药物的类别而异?
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;64(3):199-208. doi: 10.1177/0706743718802809. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Unequal access? Use of sickness absence benefits by precariously employed workers with common mental disorders: a register-based cohort study in Sweden.不平等的待遇?使用病假福利不稳定就业工人常见的精神障碍:基于登记的队列研究在瑞典。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 19;13(7):e072459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072459.
2
Understanding the medication safety challenges for patients with mental illness in primary care: a scoping review.理解初级保健中精神疾病患者的用药安全挑战:范围综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 12;23(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04850-5.
3
Improving Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care: Pilot trial of a complex intervention.
提高初级保健中心心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗的初始药物依从性:一项复杂干预措施的试点试验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;10:1038138. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1038138. eCollection 2022.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to treatments for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial and economic model (the IMA-cRCT study).提高初级保健中心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗初始药物依从性的干预措施的有效性和成本效益:实用集群随机对照试验和经济模型(IMA-cRCT 研究)的研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 5;23(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01727-6.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis on impact of suboptimal use of antidepressants, bisphosphonates, and statins on healthcare resource utilisation and healthcare cost.一项关于抗抑郁药、双磷酸盐和他汀类药物使用不当对医疗资源利用和医疗成本影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0269836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269836. eCollection 2022.
6
Initiation and Single Dispensing in Cardiovascular and Insulin Medications: Prevalence and Explanatory Factors.心血管和胰岛素药物的起始用药和单次配药:流行情况和解释因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103358.
7
Depression and glioblastoma, complicated concomitant diseases: a systemic review of published literature.抑郁症与胶质母细胞瘤,复杂并存的疾病:文献发表的系统性综述。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):497-511. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1017-2. Epub 2018 Aug 9.