Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101-1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Santa Maria University Hospital, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisbon 1649-035, Portugal.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2234-2242. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex285.
What is the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for a frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
Although the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for FET needs further research and is yet to be determined, we propose a standardized timing strategy based on the current available evidence which could assist in the harmonization and comparability of clinic practice and future trials.
Amid a continuous increase in the number of FET cycles, determining the optimal endometrial preparation protocol has become paramount to maximize ART success. In current daily practice, different FET preparation methods and timing strategies are used.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a review of the current literature on FET preparation methods, with special attention to the timing of the embryo transfer.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Literature on the topic was retrieved in PubMed and references from relevant articles were investigated until June 2017.
The number of high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is scarce and, hence, the evidence for the best protocol for FET is poor. Future research should compare both the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between HRT and true natural cycle (NC) FET. In terms of embryo transfer timing, we propose to start progesterone intake on the theoretical day of oocyte retrieval in HRT and to perform blastocyst transfer at hCG + 7 or LH + 6 in modified or true NC, respectively.
As only a few high quality RCTs on the optimal preparation for FET are available in the existing literature, no definitive conclusion for benefit of one protocol over the other can be drawn so far.
Caution when using HRT for FET is warranted since the rate of early pregnancy loss is alarmingly high in some reports.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): S.M. is funded by the Research Fund of Flanders (FWO). H.T. and C.B. report grants from Merck, Goodlife, Besins and Abbott during the conduct of the study.
Not applicable.
对于冻融胚胎移植(FET),最佳的子宫内膜准备方案是什么?
尽管 FET 的最佳子宫内膜准备方案需要进一步研究,目前尚未确定,但我们根据现有证据提出了一种标准化的时间策略,这可能有助于协调和比较临床实践和未来的试验。
随着 FET 周期数量的持续增加,确定最佳的子宫内膜准备方案对于最大限度地提高辅助生殖技术(ART)的成功率变得至关重要。在当前的日常实践中,使用不同的 FET 准备方法和时间策略。
研究设计、大小、持续时间:这是对 FET 准备方法的当前文献的综述,特别关注胚胎移植的时间。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:在 PubMed 上检索了关于该主题的文献,并调查了相关文章的参考文献,直到 2017 年 6 月。
高质量随机对照试验(RCT)的数量很少,因此 FET 最佳方案的证据不足。未来的研究应比较 HRT 和真正自然周期(NC)FET 之间的妊娠和新生儿结局。就胚胎移植时间而言,我们建议在 HRT 中从理论上的取卵日开始服用孕激素,并在改良或真正的 NC 中分别在 hCG + 7 或 LH + 6 时进行囊胚移植。
局限性/谨慎的原因:由于现有文献中只有少数关于 FET 最佳准备的高质量 RCT,因此迄今为止,还不能得出一种方案优于另一种方案的明确结论。
由于在一些报告中,早期妊娠丢失率高得惊人,因此在使用 HRT 进行 FET 时需要谨慎。
研究资金/竞争利益:S.M. 得到了佛兰德研究基金会(FWO)的资助。H.T. 和 C.B. 在研究期间报告了默克、Goodlife、Besins 和雅培的资助。
不适用。