Toftager M, Bogstad J, Løssl K, Prætorius L, Zedeler A, Bryndorf T, Nilas L, Pinborg A
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fertility Clinic Section 455, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Section of General Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358.
Are cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) similar in GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols for the first ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles from the same oocyte retrieval?
The chances of at least one live birth following utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos after the first ART cycle are similar in GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
Reproductive outcomes of ART treatment are traditionally reported as pregnancies per cycle or per embryo transfer. However, the primary concern is the overall chance of a live birth. After the first ART cycle with fresh embryo transfer, we found live birth rates (LBRs) of 22.8% and 23.8% (P = 0.70) for the GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols, respectively. But with CLBRs including both fresh and frozen embryos from the first oocyte retrieval, chances of at least one live birth increases. There are no previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CLBRs in GnRH-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist protocols. Previous studies on CLBR are either retrospective cohort studies including multiple fresh cycles or RCTs comparing single embryo transfer (SET) with double embryo transfer (DET).
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: CLBR was a secondary outcome in a Phase IV, dual-center, open-label, RCT including 1050 women allocated to a short GnRH-antagonist or a long GnRH-agonist protocol in a 1:1 ratio over a 5-year period using a web-based concealed randomization code. The minimum follow-up time from the first IVF cycle was 2 years. The aim was to compare CLBR between the two groups following utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos from the first ART cycle.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All women referred for their first ART cycle at two public fertility clinics, <40 years of age were approached. A total of 1050 subjects were allocated to treatment and 1023 women started standardized ART protocols with recombinant human follitropin-β (rFSH) stimulation. Day-2 SET was planned and additional embryos were frozen and used in subsequent frozen-thawed cycles. All pregnancies generated from oocyte retrieval during the first IVF cycle including fresh and frozen-thaw cycles were registered. Ongoing pregnancy was determined by ultrasonography at gestational week 7-9 and live birth was irrespective of the duration of gestation. CLBR was defined as at least one live birth per allocated woman after fresh and frozen cycles. Subjects were censored out after the first live birth. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the relative prognostic significance of female age, BMI, the number of retrieved oocytes and the diagnosis of infertility in relation to the CLBR.
Baseline characteristics were similar and equal proportions of patients continued with frozen-thaw (frozen embryo transfer, FET) cycles after their fresh ART cycle in the GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist arms. When combining all fresh and frozen-thaw embryo transfers from first oocyte retrieval with a minimum of 2-year follow-up, the CLBR was 34.1% (182/534) in the GnRH-antagonist group versus 31.2% (161/516) in the GnRH-agonist group (odds ratio (OR):1.14; 95% CI: 0.88-1.48, P = 0.32). Mean time to the first live birth was 11.0 months in the GnRH-antagonist group compared to 11.5 months in the GnRH-agonist group (P < 0.01). The total number of deliveries from all FET cycles where embryos were thawed were higher in the antagonist group 64/330 (19.4%) compared to the agonist group 43/355 (12.1%) ((OR): 1.74; 95% CI: 1.14-2.66, P = 0.01). The evaluation of prognostic factors showed that more retrieved oocytes were associated with a significantly higher CLBR in both treatment groups. For the subgroup of obese women (BMI >30 kg/m2), the CLBR was significantly higher in the GnRH-antagonist group (P = 0.02).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The duration of the trial is a possible limitation with introduction of new methods as 'Freeze all' and 'GnRH-agonist triggering', but as these treatments were used in only few women, a systematic bias is not likely. Blastocyst culture of surplus embryos for freezing was introduced to both groups simultaneously, thereby minimizing the risk of bias. Furthermore, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up, a minority (<1%) still had cryopreserved embryos and no live birth at the end of the trial. The post hoc prognostic covariate analyses with multiple strata should be interpreted with caution. Finally, the physicians were not blinded to GnRH treatment group after randomization.
With the improvement of embryo culture, freezing and thawing methods as well as a strategy of elective SET, CLBR until first live birth provides an all-inclusive success rate for ART. When comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols, we find similar CLBRs, despite more oocytes being retrieved in the GnRH-agonist protocol.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: An unrestricted research grant is funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (MSD). The funders had no influence on the data collection, analyses or conclusions of the study. No conflict of interests to declare.
EudraCT #: 2008-005452-24. ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00756028.
18 September 2008.
DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT: 14 January 2009.
在首个辅助生殖技术(ART)周期中,包括来自同一取卵周期的所有后续冻融周期,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂方案和GnRH激动剂方案的累积活产率(CLBR)是否相似?
在首个ART周期后使用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎,GnRH拮抗剂方案和GnRH激动剂方案至少有一次活产的几率相似。
ART治疗的生殖结局传统上报告为每个周期或每次胚胎移植的妊娠情况。然而,主要关注的是活产的总体几率。在首次进行新鲜胚胎移植的ART周期后,我们发现GnRH拮抗剂方案和GnRH激动剂方案的活产率(LBR)分别为22.8%和23.8%(P = 0.70)。但将首个取卵周期的新鲜和冷冻胚胎纳入CLBR计算时,至少有一次活产的几率会增加。此前尚无比较GnRH拮抗剂方案与GnRH激动剂方案CLBR的随机对照试验(RCT)。以往关于CLBR的研究要么是包括多个新鲜周期的回顾性队列研究,要么是比较单胚胎移植(SET)与双胚胎移植(DET)的RCT。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:CLBR是一项IV期、双中心、开放标签的RCT的次要结局,该研究纳入1050名女性,她们在5年期间按1:1比例被分配至短方案GnRH拮抗剂或长方案GnRH激动剂方案,采用基于网络的隐蔽随机编码。从首个体外受精(IVF)周期起的最短随访时间为2年。目的是比较两组在首个ART周期使用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎后的CLBR。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:在两家公立生育诊所,邀请所有年龄<40岁、首次接受ART周期治疗的女性。总共1050名受试者被分配接受治疗,1023名女性开始使用重组人促卵泡素-β(rFSH)进行标准化ART方案刺激。计划进行第2天SET,并将额外的胚胎冷冻,用于后续的冻融周期。记录首个IVF周期取卵产生的所有妊娠情况,包括新鲜和冻融周期。在妊娠第7 - 9周通过超声检查确定持续妊娠情况,活产情况则不考虑妊娠时长。CLBR定义为每位分配的女性在新鲜和冷冻周期后至少有一次活产。首次活产后将受试者排除。采用Cox比例风险模型评估女性年龄、体重指数(BMI)、取卵数量和不孕诊断与CLBR的相对预后意义。
基线特征相似,GnRH拮抗剂组和GnRH激动剂组中,在新鲜ART周期后继续进行冻融(冷冻胚胎移植,FET)周期的患者比例相同。当将首个取卵周期的所有新鲜和冻融胚胎移植合并,并进行至少2年的随访时,GnRH拮抗剂组的CLBR为34.1%(182/534),GnRH激动剂组为31.2%(161/516)(优势比(OR):1.14;95%置信区间(CI):0.88 - 1.48,P = 0.3)。GnRH拮抗剂组首次活产的平均时间为11.0个月,GnRH激动剂组为11.5个月(P < 0.01)。在所有解冻胚胎的FET周期中,拮抗剂组的分娩总数(64/330,19.4%)高于激动剂组(43/355,12.1%)((OR):1.74;95% CI:1.14 - 2.66,P = 0.01)。预后因素评估显示,两个治疗组中取卵数量越多,CLBR显著越高。对于肥胖女性亚组(BMI > 30 kg/m²),GnRH拮抗剂组的CLBR显著更高(P = 0.02)。
局限性、注意事项:试验持续时间可能是一个局限性,因为引入了“全冻”和“GnRH激动剂触发”等新方法,但由于这些治疗仅在少数女性中使用,不太可能产生系统偏差。两组同时引入了剩余胚胎的囊胚培养用于冷冻,从而将偏差风险降至最低。此外,至少随访2年,少数(<1%)患者在试验结束时仍有冷冻胚胎且未活产。对具有多个分层的事后预后协变量分析应谨慎解释。最后,随机分组后医生未对GnRH治疗组进行盲法处理。
随着胚胎培养、冷冻和解冻方法的改进以及选择性SET策略的应用,首次活产前的CLBR为ART提供了一个全面的成功率。比较GnRH拮抗剂方案和GnRH激动剂方案时,我们发现CLBR相似,尽管GnRH激动剂方案中取卵数量更多。
研究资金/利益冲突:一项无限制研究资助由美国新泽西州肯尼沃思默克公司的子公司默克雪兰诺公司(MSD)提供。资助者对研究的数据收集分析或结论没有影响。无利益冲突声明。
欧盟临床试验注册号(EudraCT):2008 - 005452 - 24。美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrial.gov):NCT00756028。
2008年9月18日。
2009年1月14日。