Richards Bryson G, Schleicher William F, D'Souza Gehaan F, Isakov Raymond, Zins James E
Private practice Las Vegas, NV.
University Hospital Medical Group, Cleveland, OH.
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Oct 1;37(9):1039-1043. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx136.
The plastic surgeon competes with both core and noncore physicians and surgeons for traditional cosmetic procedures. In 2007, the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) joined efforts to form a Cosmetic Medicine Task Force to further analyze this trend.
Our objective is to document and quantify the patient capture and total collections generated in a single surgeon's practice exclusive from Botulinum Toxin A and filler injections over a 10-year period. We subsequently identified the effect and importance that fillers and Botulinum Toxin A have on an active cosmetic practice.
A retrospective chart review of all male and female patients who received Botulinum Toxin A or soft tissue filler injections (noninvasive aesthetic treatment) in a single surgeons practice from January 2004 to December 2013 was undertaken. Only those patients new to the practice and who were exclusively seeking out Botulinum Toxin A or fillers were included in the study. Chart review then identified which of these selected patients ultimately underwent invasive aesthetic surgery during this 10-year period. Noninvasive and invasive aesthetic surgery total collections were calculated using billing records.
From January 2004 to December 2013, 375 patients entered the senior surgeon's practice specifically requesting and receiving noninvasive aesthetic treatments. Of these 375 patients, 59 patients (15.7%) subsequently underwent an aesthetic surgery procedure at an average of 19 months following initial noninvasive aesthetic treatment. Of these 375 patients, 369 were female and 6 were male. The most common initial invasive aesthetic procedure performed after injectable treatment included 22 facelifts (18.5%), 21 upper eyelid blepharoplasties (17.6%), and 15 endoscopic brow lifts (12.6%). Total collections from noninvasive aesthetic sessions and invasive surgery combined represented US$762,470 over this 10-year span. This represented US$524,771 and US$396,166 in total collections for injectables and surgery respectively.
Noninvasive aesthetic surgery is a critical part of a plastic surgery practice. A measurable and significant number of patients who sought out a single plastic surgeon exclusively for noninvasive treatment ultimately underwent traditional invasive cosmetic surgical procedures.
整形外科医生在传统美容手术方面与核心及非核心的内科医生和外科医生展开竞争。2007年,美国美容整形外科学会(ASAPS)和美国整形外科医生协会(ASPS)共同努力组建了一个美容医学特别工作组,以进一步分析这一趋势。
我们的目的是记录并量化在10年期间,一位外科医生仅排除肉毒杆菌毒素A和填充剂注射的情况下,其诊所的患者获取量和总收入。随后,我们确定了填充剂和肉毒杆菌毒素A对活跃的美容业务的影响及重要性。
对2004年1月至2013年12月期间在一位外科医生诊所接受肉毒杆菌毒素A或软组织填充剂注射(非侵入性美容治疗)的所有男性和女性患者进行回顾性病历审查。仅纳入那些首次到该诊所且专门寻求肉毒杆菌毒素A或填充剂治疗的患者。通过病历审查确定在这10年期间,这些选定患者中有哪些最终接受了侵入性美容手术。使用计费记录计算非侵入性和侵入性美容手术的总收入。
2004年1月至2013年12月期间,375名患者进入这位资深外科医生的诊所,专门要求并接受了非侵入性美容治疗。在这375名患者中,59名患者(15.7%)在首次接受非侵入性美容治疗后平均19个月后接受了美容手术。在这375名患者中,369名是女性,6名是男性。注射治疗后最常见的初始侵入性美容手术包括22例面部提升术(18.5%)、21例上睑成形术(17.6%)和15例内镜下眉提升术(12.6%)。在这10年期间,非侵入性美容疗程和侵入性手术的总收入合计为762,470美元。其中注射剂和手术的总收入分别为524,771美元和396,166美元。
非侵入性美容手术是整形外科业务的关键部分。相当数量专门寻求一位整形外科医生进行非侵入性治疗的患者最终接受了传统的侵入性美容手术。