Cheng Richard, Dawkins Sam, Tat Emily, Makar Moody, Hussaini Asma, Makkar Raj R, Trento Alfredo, Siegel Robert J, Kar Saibal
Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1595-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Achieving minimal residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after percutaneous MitraClip repair is limited by iatrogenic mitral stenosis. It is unknown whether allowing moderately elevated postprocedural mean mitral gradients (MMGs) to achieve < moderate residual MR is preferable to moderate residual regurgitation. Patients with less-than-moderate residual MR but a MMG of ≥5 mm Hg (Group 1) were compared with patients with moderate residual MR (Group 2). The primary end point was heart failure hospitalization. Secondary end points included mortality, subsequent mitral valve surgery, and MR at 1 year. Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. Group 1 included 48 patients (median MMG 6, interquartile range 5-6 mm Hg). Group 2 included 30 patients (median MMG 3.5, interquartile range 2-5 mm Hg). Age, baseline MR severity, and type of MR were not different between groups. Freedom from heart failure hospitalization at 1 year was 91.2 ± 4.2% in Group 1 versus 70.8 ± 8.7% in Group 2 (p = 0.021). Achieved differences in MR reduction between groups persisted at 1 year (p = 0.007). Survival was not different (p = 0.402), and subsequent mitral valve surgery occurred in 4 of 48 (8%) and in 4 of 30 patients (13%) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.476). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, less-than-moderate residual MR, despite moderately elevated mitral gradients, was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.96) for subsequent heart failure hospitalization (p = 0.044). In conclusion, patients with less-than-moderate residual MR despite a MMG of ≥5 had a 79% reduction in hazard for subsequent heart failure hospitalization compared with patients with moderate residual MR.
经皮二尖瓣夹合术修复后实现最小残余二尖瓣反流(MR)受到医源性二尖瓣狭窄的限制。尚不清楚允许术后平均二尖瓣压差(MMG)适度升高以实现<中度残余MR是否优于中度残余反流。将残余MR小于中度但MMG≥5 mmHg的患者(第1组)与中度残余MR的患者(第2组)进行比较。主要终点是心力衰竭住院。次要终点包括死亡率、后续二尖瓣手术以及1年时的MR。78例患者纳入研究。第1组包括48例患者(MMG中位数6,四分位间距5 - 6 mmHg)。第2组包括30例患者(MMG中位数3.5,四分位间距2 - 5 mmHg)。两组间年龄、基线MR严重程度和MR类型无差异。第1组1年时无心力衰竭住院的比例为91.2±4.2%,第2组为70.8±8.