The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street/Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):73-78. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2099-0. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
While retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is traditionally reserved for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, recent efforts to reduce long-term toxicities of radiation and chemotherapy have turned attention to its application for testicular seminomas. Currently, RPLND is reserved for the post-chemotherapy for stage II testicular seminomas; we aimed to describe current utilization of RPNLD for testicular seminomas by stage and implications for survival.
A national sample of men diagnosed with stage IA/IB/IS/IIA/IIB/IIC testicular seminoma (1988-2013) was evaluated from SEER Program registries. Stage-specific utilization of RPLND was determined. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, race, and radiotherapy, evaluated overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for the RPLND cohort. Adjusted models assessed predictors of RPLND.
A total of 17,681 men (mean age 38.1 years) with testicular seminoma were included with low utilization of RPLND for stage I disease (1.3% overall) and higher rates for stage II disease (10.6% overall). There were no appreciable trends over time. Patients receiving RPLND did not appear to have worse OS or CSS on adjusted stage-by-stage analysis. Higher stage disease (IIA-IIC) was associated with greater need for RPLND while radiotherapy was associated with decreased use [OR 0.40 (0.32-0.51), p < 0.001].
Utilization of RPLND for testicular seminomas in the post-chemotherapy setting has remained stable over a 25-year period. Patients undergoing RPLND are a higher risk cohort but stage-by-stage survival outcomes appeared comparable to men not undergoing RPLND. Upcoming trials implementing RPLND as a first-line modality for testicular seminoma or isolated retroperitoneal relapse will help better quantify relative recurrence and survival.
虽然腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND)传统上保留用于非精原细胞瘤生殖细胞肿瘤,但最近努力减少放疗和化疗的长期毒性已将注意力转向其在睾丸精原细胞瘤中的应用。目前,RPLND 保留用于化疗后 II 期睾丸精原细胞瘤;我们旨在描述 RPLND 目前在各期睾丸精原细胞瘤中的应用及其对生存的影响。
从 SEER 计划登记处评估了 1988-2013 年间诊断为 IA/IB/IS/IIA/IIB/IIC 期睾丸精原细胞瘤的男性的全国样本。确定了 RPLND 的分期特异性应用。Cox 比例风险模型,调整年龄、种族和放疗因素,评估了 RPLND 队列的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。调整后的模型评估了 RPLND 的预测因素。
共纳入 17681 名(平均年龄 38.1 岁)睾丸精原细胞瘤患者,I 期疾病(总体 1.3%)RPLND 使用率低,II 期疾病(总体 10.6%)RPLND 使用率较高。在这段时间内没有明显的趋势。调整后的分期分析显示,接受 RPLND 的患者的 OS 或 CSS 似乎没有恶化。较高的疾病分期(IIA-IIC)与对 RPLND 的更大需求相关,而放疗与减少使用相关 [比值比 0.40(0.32-0.51),p<0.001]。
在 25 年的时间里,化疗后睾丸精原细胞瘤中 RPLND 的应用保持稳定。接受 RPLND 的患者是风险较高的队列,但分期生存结果似乎与未接受 RPLND 的患者相当。即将进行的将 RPLND 作为睾丸精原细胞瘤或孤立性腹膜后复发的一线治疗模式的试验将有助于更好地量化相对复发和生存。