Mackenbach Johan P
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(suppl_4):14-17. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx160.
The persistence of socioeconomic inequalities in health, despite all that has been done to reduce social and economic inequalities in many European countries, is one of the great disappointments of public health. In this paper, I summarize the results of a series of studies into the explanation of variations and trends in inequalities in mortality in three European regions: the Nordic countries with their puzzlingly large inequalities in mortality, Southern European countries with their miraculously small inequalities in mortality and Central & Eastern European countries in which inequalities in mortality have disastrously exploded since the early 1990 s. The results of these studies show that inequalities in mortality are remarkably variable and dynamic, which suggests that it may be possible to reduce them if we exploit the entry-points for policy that these studies have also identified, such as poverty, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and lack of access to health care. At the same time, another lesson is that health inequalities are influenced in sometimes unexpected ways by factors that are not under our control, and that we cannot expect to eliminate these health inequalities soon.
尽管许多欧洲国家已采取诸多措施来减少社会和经济不平等现象,但健康方面的社会经济不平等依然存在,这是公共卫生领域令人深感失望的一大问题。在本文中,我总结了一系列研究的结果,这些研究旨在解释欧洲三个地区死亡率不平等现象的变化和趋势:北欧国家死亡率不平等现象惊人地大;南欧国家死亡率不平等现象出奇地小;中欧和东欧国家自20世纪90年代初以来死亡率不平等现象急剧恶化。这些研究结果表明,死亡率不平等现象显著多变且动态变化,这意味着如果我们利用这些研究也已确定的政策切入点,如贫困、吸烟、过度饮酒和缺乏医疗保健服务,就有可能减少不平等现象。与此同时,另一个教训是,健康不平等会受到一些我们无法控制的因素的影响,而这些影响方式有时出人意料,而且我们不能期望很快消除这些健康不平等现象。