Suppr超能文献

新自由主义长期护理:从社区到企业控制。

Neoliberal Long-Term Care: From Community to Corporate Control.

机构信息

Claude Pepper Center, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

Department of Sociology, Western Washington University, Bellingham.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2019 Mar 14;59(2):222-229. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx139.

Abstract

Publicly (mainly Medicaid) funded long-term care (LTC) services have evolved from a nursing home dominated system of service to a much more balanced system including home- and community-based services (HCBS) programs over the last 30 years. The HCBS programs have been largely administered by the state and local level nonprofit aging networks (ANs) consisting of Area Agencies on Aging and thousands of service providers. Over the last decade, however, for-profit HMOs administered primarily by large insurance companies have begun to displace AN organizations. State policymakers have embraced for-profit privatizations under the rationale that this approach will generate greater savings, efficiencies, and higher quality outcomes than the traditional public or private nonprofit models of program administration. As we show here, there is very little evidence for this rationale; yet, this lack of evidence has not prevented the continuing growth of for-profit managed LTC programs supported more by an ideology of market fundamentalism than empirical evidence. We also describe six possible consequences of the trend toward corporate control of public LTC services in the years ahead.

摘要

在过去的 30 年里,公共(主要是医疗补助)资助的长期护理(LTC)服务已经从以疗养院为主的服务系统演变为更加平衡的系统,包括家庭和社区为基础的服务(HCBS)计划。HCBS 计划主要由州和地方非营利性老龄化网络(ANs)管理,这些网络由地区老龄化机构和数千个服务提供商组成。然而,在过去的十年中,主要由大型保险公司管理的营利性 HMO 已经开始取代 AN 组织。州政策制定者接受了营利性私有化,理由是这种方法将比传统的公共或私营非营利组织的项目管理模式产生更大的节约、效率和更高质量的结果。正如我们在这里所展示的,这种理由几乎没有证据;然而,这种缺乏证据并没有阻止营利性管理的长期护理计划的持续增长,这些计划更多地受到市场原教旨主义意识形态的支持,而不是经验证据的支持。我们还描述了未来几年公共长期护理服务向企业控制趋势的六个可能后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验