Suppr超能文献

多中心验证 4 孔唑琼脂板作为一种筛选方法,用于检测临床相关唑类耐药烟曲霉。

Multicentre validation of 4-well azole agar plates as a screening method for detection of clinically relevant azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus.

机构信息

Unit of Mycology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Dec 1;72(12):3325-3333. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx319.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus is emerging worldwide. Reference susceptibility testing methods are technically demanding and no validated commercial susceptibility tests for moulds currently exist. In this multicentre study a 4-well azole-containing screening agar method was evaluated using clinically relevant isolates.

METHODS

Forty WT and 39 cyp51A mutant A. fumigatus [G54 (n = 10), M220 (n = 10), TR34/L98H (n = 9) and TR46/Y121F/T289A (n = 10)] were tested individually and as simulated mixed samples (sampling 4 WT and 1 mutant colonies). EUCAST MICs were determined following E.Def 9.3. In-house and commercial 4-well plates containing agars supplemented with 4 mg/L itraconazole, 1 mg/L voriconazole, 0.5 mg/L posaconazole and no antifungal, respectively, were evaluated. Growth was scored (0-3) by two independent observers in three laboratories. Inter-plate, inter-observer, essential and categorical agreement, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

CYP51A genotype and antifungal compound-specific MICs and growth patterns were documented. The inter-observer agreement was excellent with 86%-99% identical scores (range 80%-100%) for both plates. The qualitative agreement (no growth versus growth) was excellent (median 95%-100%, range 87%-100%, overall). The overall sensitivity and specificity for the 4-well plate (no growth versus growth) was 99% (range 97%-100%) and 99% (95%-100%), respectively. The sensitivity for simulated WT/mutant specimens was 94% (range 83%-100%) for the WT-TR34/L98H combination, but 100% for the WT/G54W combination. The performance remained unchanged using only itraconazole- and voriconazole-containing agars, but was lower for the other combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the 4-well screening plate in routine laboratories will allow easy and reliable detection of the most common azole-resistant A. fumigatus.

摘要

目的

唑类耐药烟曲霉在全球范围内不断出现。参考药敏检测方法技术要求高,目前尚无经过验证的商业化霉菌药敏检测方法。本研究采用多中心方法,使用临床相关分离株对 4 孔含唑类药物筛选琼脂法进行评估。

方法

40 株野生型(WT)和 39 株 Cyp51A 突变型烟曲霉[G54(n=10)、M220(n=10)、TR34/L98H(n=9)和 TR46/Y121F/T289A(n=10)]单独检测,并模拟混合样本(分别取 4 个 WT 和 1 个突变菌落)进行检测。根据 E.Def 9.3 确定 EUCAST MIC 值。分别使用含有 4mg/L 伊曲康唑、1mg/L 伏立康唑、0.5mg/L 泊沙康唑和无抗真菌药物的 4 孔琼脂平板进行检测。由 3 个实验室的 2 名独立观察者对平板进行评分(0-3 分)。计算平板间、观察者间、定性和分类一致性、敏感性和特异性。

结果

记录了 Cyp51A 基因型和抗真菌化合物特异性 MIC 值和生长模式。两种平板的观察者间一致性极好,评分完全一致(范围 80%-100%,得分 86%-99%)。平板定性(无生长与生长)的一致性极好(中位数 95%-100%,范围 87%-100%,总体)。4 孔平板(无生长与生长)的总敏感性和特异性分别为 99%(范围 97%-100%)和 99%(95%-100%)。WT/TR34/L98H 组合的模拟 WT/突变标本的敏感性为 94%(范围 83%-100%),但 WT/G54W 组合的敏感性为 100%。仅使用伊曲康唑和伏立康唑含琼脂时,性能保持不变,但其他组合的性能较低。

结论

在常规实验室中实施 4 孔筛选平板将能够轻松可靠地检测最常见的唑类耐药烟曲霉。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验