State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3041-3046. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx260.
Why do microRNAs (miRNAs) weakly repress so many targets such that most targets do not have phenotypic effects? An increasingly accepted view posits that weak targeting has no biological function and each miRNA effectively has only a few functional targets. Here, we review the evolutionary arguments for this postulate and find these arguments seriously flawed. In contrast, from the systems perspective, the power of broad and weak targeting may reside in the cumulative effects of all repressions, which collectively stabilize gene regulatory networks. This view predicts that miRNAs would show little tendency to downsize their target pools. A survey of "twin-miRs" production indeed validates this prediction.
为什么 microRNAs(miRNAs)会微弱地抑制如此多的靶标,以至于大多数靶标没有表型效应?一个越来越被接受的观点认为,弱靶向没有生物学功能,每个 miRNA 实际上只有少数几个功能靶标。在这里,我们回顾了这一假设的进化论据,发现这些论据存在严重缺陷。相比之下,从系统的角度来看,广泛而微弱的靶向的力量可能在于所有抑制作用的累积效应,这些抑制作用共同稳定了基因调控网络。这一观点预测,miRNAs 不会倾向于缩小其靶标池。对“双胞胎 miRNAs”产生的调查确实验证了这一预测。