Lisi Giorgio, Rossini Roberto, Gentile Irene, Ruffo Giacomo
Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital of Verona Verona, Italy.
Department of General Surgery, Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Oct 12;31:106-110.
The main drawback of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the severity of postoperative complications. Staple line reinforcement (SLR) is strongly advocated. Recently, over-sewing has been proposed as a cost-effective and helpful method for reinforcing the staple line. The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience with LSG comparing over-sewing over the entire staple line with the upper-third staple line.
All obese patients seen at Negrar Sacro Cuore, Don Calabria Hospital were entered into our prospective database and were retrospectively evaluated. Complications (divided as major complications: leaks and bleeding; and minor complications: dysphagia, esophagitis, and reflux disease) and reoperations were recorded for all patients. Complications were graded according to the Clavien classification system.
From February 2015 to March 2016, 30 patients underwent LSG. Patients were divided in two groups according to over-sewing: Group A-over-sewing over the entire staple line; and Group B upper-third over-sewing. Mean total operative time was longer in Group A-90 minutes-compared with 85 minutes in Group B. In regard to minor complications, we reported one esophagitis and two cases of dysphagia in Group B and one dysphagia in Group A. Gastroesophageal reflux was higher in Group B than in Group A (3 vs. 1, p=0.149). Three major complications were observed (10%): two bleeding and one hematoma in Group B and no major complications occurred in Group A. All major complications were conservatively treated. No leaks were reported in both groups. No mortality was observed.
Over-sewing of the staple line was associated with fewer leaks but no conclusions can be drawn regarding the effects of over-sewing on staple line bleedings. Before standardizing surgical techniques further, trials are necessary to improve our knowledge about over-sewing in LSG.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的主要缺点是术后并发症严重。强烈主张进行钉合线加固(SLR)。最近,有人提出缝合是一种经济有效的钉合线加固方法。本研究的目的是报告我们对LSG的初步经验,比较在整个钉合线和上三分之一钉合线进行缝合的情况。
在内格拉尔圣心多纳卡拉布里亚医院就诊的所有肥胖患者均被纳入我们的前瞻性数据库,并进行回顾性评估。记录所有患者的并发症(分为主要并发症:渗漏和出血;以及次要并发症:吞咽困难、食管炎和反流病)和再次手术情况。并发症根据Clavien分类系统分级。
2015年2月至2016年3月,30例患者接受了LSG。根据缝合情况将患者分为两组:A组 - 在整个钉合线进行缝合;B组 - 上三分之一进行缝合。A组的平均总手术时间较长,为90分钟,而B组为85分钟。关于次要并发症,我们报告B组有1例食管炎和2例吞咽困难,A组有1例吞咽困难。B组的胃食管反流高于A组(3例对1例,p = 0.149)。观察到3例主要并发症(10%):B组有2例出血和1例血肿,A组未发生主要并发症。所有主要并发症均经保守治疗。两组均未报告渗漏。未观察到死亡病例。
钉合线缝合与较少的渗漏相关,但关于缝合对钉合线出血的影响尚无定论。在进一步规范手术技术之前,有必要进行试验以增进我们对LSG中缝合的了解。