• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较表没药醇 0.015%凝胶与双氯芬酸钠 3%凝胶治疗面部或头皮光化性角化病的头对头随机对照 IV 期临床试验。

Phase IV head-to-head randomized controlled trial comparing ingenol mebutate 0·015% gel with diclofenac sodium 3% gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis on the face or scalp.

机构信息

Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, St. Josef-Hospital, Bochum, Germany.

Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;178(2):433-442. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16048. Epub 2018 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1111/bjd.16048
PMID:29030864
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) and diclofenac sodium (DS) are approved treatments for actinic keratosis (AK).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of IngMeb 0·015% gel with DS 3% gel (NCT02406014).

METHODS

Patients with 4-8 visible, discrete AK lesions on the face/scalp in a 25 cm contiguous area of skin were randomized 1:1 to IngMeb once-daily for three consecutive days or DS twice-daily for 90 days. Patients with AK lesions at Week 8 following IngMeb were offered a second IngMeb course. Primary end point was complete clearance of AK lesions (AKCLEAR 100) at end of first treatment course (Week 8, IngMeb; Week 17, DS). Secondary end points included AKCLEAR 100 at end of last treatment course and Week 17; adverse events (AEs) were assessed at these time points. Patients completed treatment satisfaction questionnaires for medication (TSQM; Week 17).

RESULTS

AKCLEAR 100 at end of first treatment course was higher with IngMeb (34%) vs. DS (23%; P = 0·006). AKCLEAR 100 at end of last IngMeb course (53%) and Week 17 (45%) was higher than DS (both P < 0·001). The most frequent AE was application-site erythema (IngMeb 19%; DS 12%). Treatment-related AE (TRAE) duration was shorter with IngMeb. TRAE withdrawals were lower for IngMeb (2%) vs. DS (6%). TSQM scores for global satisfaction (P < 0·001) and effectiveness (P = 0·002) were higher with IngMeb, as was dosing instruction adherence (≥ 90% vs. 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

AKCLEAR 100, patient treatment satisfaction and effectiveness were significantly higher with IngMeb compared with DS, demonstrating superiority of IngMeb for AK treatment on face/scalp.

摘要

背景

Ingenol 咪泊三醇(IngMeb)和双氯芬酸钠(DS)均已获批用于治疗光化性角化病(AK)。

目的

比较 IngMeb 0.015%凝胶与 DS 3%凝胶的疗效和安全性(NCT02406014)。

方法

在面部/头皮 25cm 连续皮肤区域内有 4-8 个可见、离散 AK 病变的患者,按 1:1 随机分为 IngMeb 组(每天一次,连续 3 天)或 DS 组(每天两次,共 90 天)。在 IngMeb 治疗 8 周后 AK 病变未清除的患者可接受第二次 IngMeb 治疗。主要终点为首次治疗结束时 AK 病变完全清除(AKCLEAR 100)(第 8 周,IngMeb;第 17 周,DS)。次要终点包括末次治疗结束和第 17 周时的 ACKLEAR 100;这些时间点评估不良事件(AE)。患者在第 17 周时完成药物治疗满意度问卷(TSQM)。

结果

首次治疗结束时 IngMeb 组的 ACKLEAR 100 更高(34%),而 DS 组为 23%(P=0.006)。末次 IngMeb 治疗结束时(53%)和第 17 周时(45%)的 ACKLEAR 100 更高(均 P<0.001)。最常见的 AE 是用药部位红斑(IngMeb 19%;DS 12%)。IngMeb 的治疗相关 AE(TRAE)持续时间更短。IngMeb 的 TRAE 停药率更低(2%),而 DS 组为 6%。IngMeb 组的全球满意度(P<0.001)和疗效(P=0.002)评分更高,用药依从性(≥90%)也更高。

结论

与 DS 相比,IngMeb 治疗 AK 的 ACKLEAR 100、患者治疗满意度和疗效均显著更高,表明 IngMeb 在面部/头皮 AK 治疗方面具有优越性。

相似文献

1
Phase IV head-to-head randomized controlled trial comparing ingenol mebutate 0·015% gel with diclofenac sodium 3% gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis on the face or scalp.比较表没药醇 0.015%凝胶与双氯芬酸钠 3%凝胶治疗面部或头皮光化性角化病的头对头随机对照 IV 期临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Feb;178(2):433-442. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16048. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
2
Efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel in field treatment of actinic keratosis on full face, balding scalp, or approximately 250 cm on the chest: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial.英诺皮肤活化剂凝胶治疗全面部、脱发头皮或胸部约 250cm2 面积的光化性角化病的疗效和安全性:一项 3 期随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar;82(3):642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.083. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial.外用皮质类固醇对 1 至 3 级光化性角化病(AK)经 ingenol mebutate 治疗后的炎症或疗效无影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Apr;74(4):709-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.034. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
A seamless phase I/II dose-finding trial assessing ingenol disoxate (LEO 43204) for field treatment of actinic keratosis on the scalp.一项评估 Ingenol 双油酸酯(LEO 43204)用于头皮光化性角化病现场治疗的 I/II 期无缝剂量发现试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jun;176(6):1456-1464. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15304. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Efficacy and safety of follow-up field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate 0·015% gel: a randomized, controlled 12-month study.疗效和安全性的随访领域治疗光化性角化病与 ingenol 咪喹莫特 0·015%凝胶:一项随机、对照 12 个月的研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Mar;174(3):505-13. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14222. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
6
Tracking actinic keratosis of face and scalp treated with 0.015% ingenol mebutate to identify clinical and dermoscopic predictors of treatment response.追踪面部和头皮用 0.015% ingenol mebutate 治疗的光化性角化病,以确定治疗反应的临床和皮肤镜预测因素。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1461-1468. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14803. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Treatment responder analysis in actinic keratosis: can it lead the way to individualized choice of treatment?光化性角化病的治疗应答分析:是否能为个体化治疗选择提供指导?
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Jun;32(4):411-417. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1662879. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
8
Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis.咪喹莫特乳膏治疗光化性角化病。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1010-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111170.
9
A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body.一项随机试验,比较在头部和身体两个不同部位使用鬼臼毒素酊同步治疗与序贯治疗光化性角化病的效果。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Nov;29(11):2192-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13211. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
A multicentre, open, investigator-initiated phase IV clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel, 0·015% on the face and scalp, and 0·05% on the trunk and extremities, in Korean patients with actinic keratosis (PERFECT).一项多中心、开放性、研究者发起的 IV 期临床试验,旨在评估 0.015%浓度的 Ingenol Mebutate 凝胶用于面部和头皮,以及 0.05%浓度的 Ingenol Mebutate 凝胶用于躯干和四肢治疗韩国光化性角化病患者的疗效和安全性(PERFECT)。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Oct;179(4):836-843. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16368. Epub 2018 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Topical Treatments for Actinic Keratosis in Italian National Health System.意大利国家卫生系统中光化性角化病局部治疗的成本效益分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 22;13(21):6312. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216312.
2
Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?为何Wnt/β-连环蛋白尚未成为癌症常规治疗的靶点?
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;17(7):949. doi: 10.3390/ph17070949.
3
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tirbanibulin for Actinic Keratosis of the Face and Scalp in Europe: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
替巴替尼治疗欧洲面部和头皮光化性角化病的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1654. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061654.
4
Activation of PKC supports the anticancer activity of tigilanol tiglate and related epoxytiglianes.PKC 的激活支持比卡鲁胺和相关环氧替加氟的抗癌活性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80397-9.
5
Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions in Actinic Keratoses.光化性角化病干预措施疗效与可接受性的系统文献综述和网状荟萃分析
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Jan 4;101(1):adv00358. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3690.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis from Post-Marketing Surveillance Trials.一项基于上市后监测试验的光化性角化病干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 15;9(7):2253. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072253.
7
Actinic keratoses: review of clinical, dermoscopic, and therapeutic aspects.光化性角化病:临床、皮肤镜及治疗方面的综述
An Bras Dermatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;94(6):637-657. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
A Rare Presentation of Actinic Keratosis Affecting the Tarsal Conjunctiva and Review of the Literature.睑结膜光化性角化病的罕见表现及文献综述
Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2018 Feb 12;2018:4375354. doi: 10.1155/2018/4375354. eCollection 2018.