Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e477-e493. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
BACKGROUND: For clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been shown in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 to be sufficient for women with 1 to 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes with no added benefit for completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Z0011 specified whole breast radiotherapy (RT) using standard tangential fields; however, later analysis showed variation in field design. We assessed nationwide practice patterns and examined factors associated with patients undergoing completion ALND and subsequent radiation field design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery, axillary staging, and whole breast RT in 2012 to 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine axillary management and RT, adjusting for demographic and clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: Among 83,555 patients meeting criteria, 9.3% underwent upfront ALND, 75.8% underwent SLNB only, and 14.9% underwent SLNB with completion ALND. From 2012 to 2013, upfront SLNB increased from 90.1% to 91.4% (odds ratio, 1.14; P < .001). Among 9474 patients that underwent SLNB with 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes, 31.2% received completion ALND. Among patients with 1 to 2 positive sentinel nodes, SLNB increased from 65.8% to 72.1% from 2012 to 2013 (P < .001). For patients with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes that underwent SLNB only, 63.4% underwent breast RT, whereas 36.6% received breast and nodal RT. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide practice patterns of axillary management vary. Despite an increasing rate of SLNB, many patients still receive upfront and completion ALND. Furthermore, there is significant variation in RT field design, and modern treatment guidelines are warranted for this patient population.
背景:对于临床 T1-2N0 乳腺癌,美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组(ACOSOG)的 Z0011 研究表明,对于 1 至 2 个阳性前哨淋巴结且无附加获益的女性,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)足以替代完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)。Z0011 规定使用标准切线野进行全乳放射治疗(RT);然而,后来的分析表明,野设计存在差异。我们评估了全国的实践模式,并研究了与接受完成性 ALND 和随后的放射野设计相关的因素。 患者和方法:在 2012 年至 2013 年间,国家癌症数据库中确定了接受保乳手术、腋窝分期和全乳 RT 的临床 T1-2N0 乳腺癌女性。使用多变量逻辑回归模型检查腋窝管理和 RT,并根据人口统计学和临床病理因素进行调整。 结果:在符合条件的 83555 例患者中,9.3%的患者行 upfront ALND,75.8%的患者仅行 SLNB,14.9%的患者行 SLNB 加完成性 ALND。2012 年至 2013 年间, upfront SLNB 从 90.1%增加到 91.4%(优势比,1.14;P<.001)。在 9474 例行 1 至 2 个阳性前哨淋巴结 SLNB 的患者中,31.2%接受了完成性 ALND。在 1 至 2 个阳性前哨淋巴结的患者中,2012 年至 2013 年间,SLNB 从 65.8%增加到 72.1%(P<.001)。仅行 SLNB 的 1 至 2 个阳性淋巴结患者中,63.4%行乳房 RT,而 36.6%行乳房和淋巴结 RT。 结论:全国范围内的腋窝管理实践模式存在差异。尽管 SLNB 的使用率不断增加,但许多患者仍接受 upfront 和完成性 ALND。此外,RT 野设计存在显著差异,需要为这一患者群体制定现代治疗指南。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017-10-13
Ir J Med Sci. 2016-2
J Surg Oncol. 2022-9
JAMA Oncol. 2017-12-1
Ir J Med Sci. 2016-2
J Clin Oncol. 2014-11-10
Breast. 2013-12