Suppr超能文献

早期胃癌内镜下非治愈性切除后的长期结局:追加内镜治疗的最佳时机。

Long-term outcomes after noncurative endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the optimal time for additional endoscopic treatment.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr;87(4):1003-1013.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes with noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) and surveillance strategies such as the optimal time for additional endoscopic treatment in patients with noncurative ESD.

METHODS

Of 2527 patients who underwent gastric ESD for EGC, 512 (20.3%) patients with noncurative resection were reviewed. Noncurative resection is defined as positive resected margins on histology, lymphovascular infiltration, or beyond the expanded criteria for ESD.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation follow-up duration was 79.0 ± 55.7 months. A total of 264 patients (51.6%) and 50 patients (9.8%) underwent surgery and endoscopic treatment after noncurative resection, respectively, whereas 198 patients (38.7%) were observed. Cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly different among the surgery, other endoscopic treatment, and observation groups (96.7%, 86.8%, and 86.2%, respectively; P =.030; and 92.5%, 73.6%, and 63.0%, respectively; P < .001). When patients who underwent surgery were excluded, the disease-free survival rate of recurrence was not significantly different between the endoscopic treatment and observation groups (73.6% vs 63.0%; P = .548). To exclude the potential for the presence of lymph node metastasis, we further analyzed disease-free survival of local recurrence by comparing the patients with only a positive lateral resection margin. The disease-free survival rate was higher in the endoscopic treatment group than in the observation group (89.2% vs 69.1%; P = .023). Moreover, additional endoscopic treatment within 3 months showed significant associations with lower risk of local recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.017; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.260; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with noncurative ESD, additional surgery showed a better long-term outcome; moreover, when a positive lateral resection margin was the only noncurative factor, additional endoscopic treatment within 3 months could be considered to improve disease-free survival.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期胃癌(EGC)的非治愈性结局,并探讨非治愈性 ESD 患者的最佳追加内镜治疗时机等随访策略。

方法

对 2527 例行 EGC 内镜黏膜下剥离术的患者进行回顾性分析,其中 512 例(20.3%)患者的切除标本存在非治愈性切缘、脉管浸润或超出 ESD 扩大适应证。

结果

中位随访时间为 79.0±55.7 个月。非治愈性 ESD 后分别有 264 例(51.6%)和 50 例(9.8%)患者接受了手术和内镜治疗,198 例(38.7%)患者仅接受了观察。手术组、其他内镜治疗组和观察组的患者胃癌特异性生存率和无病生存率差异均有统计学意义(96.7%、86.8%和 86.2%,P=0.030;92.5%、73.6%和 63.0%,P<0.001)。排除手术患者后,内镜治疗组和观察组的复发患者无病生存率差异无统计学意义(73.6%比 63.0%,P=0.548)。为排除潜在的淋巴结转移,我们进一步比较了仅存在侧向切缘阳性的患者的局部复发无病生存率,结果显示内镜治疗组的无病生存率高于观察组(89.2%比 69.1%,P=0.023)。多因素分析显示,3 个月内追加内镜治疗与局部复发风险降低显著相关(风险比 0.017,95%置信区间 0.002~0.260,P=0.003)。

结论

对于非治愈性 ESD 患者,追加手术可获得更好的长期结局;当仅存在侧向切缘阳性这一非治愈性因素时,3 个月内追加内镜治疗可改善无病生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验